I'm not saying it's a good system, but one that exists due to the nature of the funding. Those external pressures (especially when it gets political) just don't allow for the same amount of mistakes.
Remember, SpaceX was one failed launch away from bankruptcy.
You are omitting the lede. Public appetite for failure on tax payer funds is near zero. That increases time, complexity, and cost for launches (with or without humans aboard).
Isn't it possible to allow-list certain numbers?
In addition to or in lieu of the Adderall?
Didn't they originally try to brush this off as credential stuffing and aggregation?
There should be harsher penalties around mishandling people's data, especially if you lie about it to save face.
What a shit clickbait headline. They are removing inactive accounts not old content.
Pixel 3 owner here. I'm done with google after this phone dies.
They're cranking the bad PR to 11 so they can dial it back to 9 and point to it as a compromise.
Guess we're done here folks. This guy says it's not a problem so it must not be!
Over half my feed is just low effort memes or auto posted arstechnica articles. Does this data include bot posts?
Seems like you've put a lot of thought into it already. What's preventing you for paying for an engineer survey as a next step to answer the feasibility questions/assumptions you have.
Let's call out complete proteins too. Otherwise you still have to mix and match food sources. Soy would probably win.