Please please please do not bork this one, I don't want to abandon another game I love. Hopefully it's not like KSP 2 or Cities Skylines 2
someacnt
Exactly, C++ is what came to my mind when I saw this. Some people don't put references??
Security by obscurity does not work, because people are only so creative up to a point. Hence, there are only handful of configurations for the attacker to try out.
This contrasts to e.g. 128-bit secure encryption, which involves trying 2^128 times to break it - which is a number with whopping 38 zeros. It takes 10^22 years to break it with trying at 1GHz rate. It is simply incomparable, and adding a few bits of security by obscure combination is simply not worth it.
Yet, so many people and organizations seem to prefer obscurity to actual security.
Oh, do you happen to be a physicist or an analyst?
That must have been soul-crushing.. On the other hand, you get a second chance where you will do much better! Do not fret about the past mistakes, only think of how you will do well in the future.
In some countries (like mine), we don't have second chance like that.. You are in much better position than us!
Same. Maybe I.. gasp.. like trains?
I wonder if we can really trust the TEEs. Isn't it their hardware where they are quite free to do what they want? Also it looks very vulnerable to the side-channel attacks.
I feel like they are confounding LLMs AND general AI/ML. The latter is useful in many areas, while the former is mostly hype imo.
That's such a way to dismiss the theory and academia
You know that is a lie, a lip service for the gullible mass. Samsung just does not care about security and privacy because it does not boost their profits.
IMHO, although it is hard to solve, it is neither brilliant nor profound - rather, it is misleading. It relies on a simple and common trickery involving multiple of 3, which is easy to see through for those with mathematical intuition. Of course many do not practice math, so it is seemingly interesting for them, but it's not much.