synestia

joined 2 years ago
[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago

Can you show me where it hurts?

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 week ago

Firefox with ublock.

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Of my saturdaymorning brain understands this correctly you might in fact be right https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#GPLStaticVsDynamic

Edit: however: https://www.reddit.com/r/linuxquestions/comments/1hdwm04/comment/m1zmt9d/ and https://docs.kernel.org/process/license-rules.html#id1

So I feel like this is definitely still possible and 'legal' depending on the implementation. Nvidia and AMD have done it for years.

IANAL though :p

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not on GitHub or any other platform complying with takedown requests though.

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Not if they're kernel modules, written from scratch, afaik

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 4 points 11 months ago

If possible: do that on company time. Let the boss pay for it.

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

Pay the Wallabag man some money to host it for you. It's like $15 per year or something?

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago
[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Care to elaborate on 'the risks of flatpak'. If you are refering to the practice of people using unofficial flatpaks: Yes I think that poses a certain risk because you are adding an additional party to your threat model.

[–] synestia@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (11 children)

And yet I get blinded every single day

 
view more: next ›