tal

joined 2 years ago
[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't think I've ever looked up a book up there to evaluate it. I might glance at an Amazon rating if I'm buying it on Amazon and it's already in front of my eyes. But, let me see what I think.

looks a few books up

I don't think that I'd want to use a 4.0 bar on that website. For example, I enjoyed Roger Zelazny's The Chronicles of Amber fantasy series


particularly the early ones


and the first book is 3.97. Frank Herbert's Dune series does, I think, go downhill over the course of the series, but books #2, #3, and #4 all are below 4. Neil Gaiman's American Gods, which I was kinda disappointed with, is 4.1.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Four stars on what rating system?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

I'd just SMS them and see if they respond. I mean, you're setting up a viewing. That shouldn't take that many messages.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 14 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (4 children)

I haven't paid much attention to where fixed automatic weapons were mounted in the past, but looking at the M2 Browning, it looks like it's mounted with the gun directly in line with the pivot point.

Here's a British 20 mm Oerlikon from WW2. Same thing: the gun is mounted directly over the axis on which the gun pivots.

It kinda seems to me like even if you could manage to handle the weapon's recoil, you probably wouldn't want to have it mounted off-center like that Russian weapon is, since it'd pull to the side when you fire it, mess with your accuracy. I can't really think of any advantage to mounting it the way they have it.

Does kinda make me wonder how common that is.

EDIT: It sounds like this is nonstandard:

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DatS7TAK-GO/

Trending: Russian mobile air defense team training with a YakB-12.7 machine gun ended in chaos when the gunner almost k!lled his own instructor.

The reason is surprisingly simple. Someone thought it was a good idea to mount the YakB-12.7 - a machine gun producing roughly 1,400 kgf (about 1.4 tonnes) of recoil force - on a rotating turret where the barrel’s axis is offset from the turret’s axis of rotation.

The YakB-12.7 is the primary weapon of the USPU-24 used on the Mi-24 attack helicopter.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/YakB-12.7_machine_gun

EDIT2: Or, rather, maybe it is standard in 2026 Russian air defense, but it's not how the weapon was originally intended to be used, is being repurposed.

EDIT3: This seems to show the same weapon mounted on a similar platform, but the position of the ammo box is reversed (on the right side rather than the left, as the operator is facing) and (as you can see at about 23 seconds) the gun is centered on the axis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HyjNMKyPO2c

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 8 hours ago

Idaho only has two House seats, so it's not too hard to cover the whole thing.

I do note with some interest that while Wyoming and North Dakota aren't on there, Idaho and West Virginia are. Those four states were the four states with the highest percentage share for Trump in 2024, and both Idaho and West Virginia have independents running in all House districts.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 8 hours ago

A comparison of messaging systems that doesn't list XMPP?

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago)

Hmm. It looks like those tanks are maybe 2 km to the southwest of whatever was burning at the Gazprom location. You can see them in my image.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 1 points 8 hours ago

Right there with you. The world I grew up in from BBS’s to dial up internet to gaming with friends ( that took serious work to run and connect over phone lines) to innovation after innovation that was for pure excitement and exploration and solving problems and making things easier and simpler is gone.

https://www.telnetbbsguide.com/

The Telnet BBS Guide focuses Bulletin Board Systems – the original Social Network, serving the BBS community for over 28 years! We list both Dial-Up and Telnet accessible Bulletin Board Systems all over the world. We currently list 1010 BBS and related systems with brief and detailed descriptions and a downloadable text-version listing suitable for listing on your BBS or for as a download for others to view and use.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (2 children)

The details could not be immediately verified by the Kyiv Independent.

NASA FIRMS is showing two fires at something labeled as a Gazprom location in Mikhailovsk in Google Maps.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Realistically, I don't think that the Admiral Kuznetsov is going to sail again. Like, that was basically at what is probably more-or-less the end of its life. I doubt that Russia's going to have the funds or that it's going to be high enough on the priority list to get working before it's just completely uneconomical and obsolete. Even if Russia weren't burning tons of resources fighting Ukraine, I don't know if it'd be coming back.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_aircraft_carrier_Admiral_Kuznetsov

On 30 October 2018, the ship was damaged when Russia's biggest floating drydock, PD-50, sank, causing one of its 70-ton cranes to crash onto the ship's flight deck, leaving behind a 19-square-metre (200 sq ft) hole. One person was reported missing and four were injured as the drydock sank in Kola Bay. The ship was in the process of being removed from the dock when the incident occurred and was towed to a nearby yard after the incident.[12] The cost of repairing the damage was estimated to be RUB 70 million (about US$1 million).[83] The fallen crane was removed by the end of 2018.[84]

In late May 2019, repair work of the aircraft carrier was underway.[85] That same month, it was also announced that two graving docks in Murmansk would be merged and enlarged to accommodate the ship, the work taking a year and a half.[86] In December 2019, a major fire broke out on board the ship as work continued on the ship's refit.[13] Two people died and more than a dozen were injured in the fire, and damage to the ship was estimated at US$8 million.[87]

In June 2021, Vladimir Korolev, Vice President of the United Shipbuilding Corporation announced that the overhaul and upgrade of Admiral Kuznetsov was expected to be completed by the first half of 2023.[88] The avionics, flight deck with the ski jump, electric equipment, and the power plant were expected to be replaced as part of this process. The carrier would also receive a new fully domestic takeoff and landing control system, with the onboard airpower remaining the same. Due to the lack of a large enough drydock, a new drydock was being constructed in Murmansk.[89] In November 2021 it was reported that "bad weather" had caused significant delays to repair work which might push back the completion of the refit by more than one year.[90]

The ship was finally dry-docked on 20 May 2022.[91] By 27 July 2022, the drydock had been drained, allowing repairs on the aircraft carrier to commence.[92] On 15 August 2022, the head of the United Shipbuilding Corporation confirmed that Admiral Kuznetsov would be handed over to the Russian Navy in the first quarter of 2024, and that the ship is expected to remain in service for at least another 25 years.[93] On 22 December 2022, as the ship was being prepared to leave drydock, another fire occurred. The fire was extinguished, and no casualties were reported.[87] On 25 January 2023, it was reported that Admiral Kuznetsov would leave the drydock in February 2023.[94] The aircraft carrier was removed from the drydock on 21 February 2023, although it was initially reported that the operation had been suspended due to heavy fog.[95]

Prior to the December 2022 fire the overhaul of the carrier was projected to last into 2024.[14][87][96]

In September 2024, an OSINT analysis revealed that Admiral Kuznetsov's crew of approximately 1,500 sailors were reassigned to the Russian Army for combat duty in Ukraine. This fueled speculation that there is no plan to make Admiral Kuznetsov seaworthy again.[17][97] As of July 2025, it was reported that repair and modernization work on the carrier had been suspended and that Russian Defence Ministry is considering scrapping the vessel due to the ship's age and condition and the mounting cost of its overhaul.[98] The same month, UK Defence Journal reported public comments by Admiral Sergei Avakyants, former head of Russia's Pacific Fleet, suggesting institutional support for the decision to retire the carrier. He described classic aircraft carriers as expensive and inefficient in modern conflict scenarios, arguing that unmanned systems and robotic platforms are the future.[99] Russian media outlet www1.ru reported in January 2026 that Admiral Kuznetsov may be repaired once the PD-50 floating dock is repaired.[100][101]

In February 2026, Ecuadorian news sources reported that the Admiral Kuznetsov would be decommissioned due to the high cost of repairs.[102]

If the Russian Navy's funding situation improves in the near future, which I would not bet on, I think that there are probably other things that are more cost-effective that they're going to want to use their budget for.

I mean, just look at this post alone. Ukraine's busy clobbering Russian merchant shipping, and what's left of the Black Sea Fleet isn't able to stop it. It's a pretty safe bet that any other countries that Russia might hypothetically get into a scrap with have been also taking notes. Russia's going to need air defense and USV defense more than the ability to fly some very elderly naval aviation aircraft, not to mention the many, many other things that are going to be competing for Russian budget other than naval spending after this war.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 7 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (2 children)

Mmm...an important caveat there is that that effect would happen if one considers the impact on the UK as it exists in the absence of such hypothetical rules. I think that you'd find that if you put a cap in place, you would shortly thereafter discover a bunch of lawyers have produced financial structures designed to effectively work around said rules.

For example, there's a limit on how much one can contribute to a political party in the US, but one might contribute to various political action committees or to various non-specific-candidate-centered NGOs or so forth. I don't think that there's any limit on how much one can personally spend promoting a candidate.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

I personally prefer Markdown to BBCode and not having to have a ton of different different accounts, but if you want phpBB forums, they are out there. Search a Web search engine for a string that exists on the website that the forum software displays by default. "Powered by vBulletin", "Powered by phpBB", etc.

searches

https://www.findaforum.net/Home/TopForums/

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmus.org/post/23759881

Of course it is. Of course.

 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/49199407

The layoffs at one of your studios most able to ship games is a bonkers, stupid decision; but pivoting Obsidian to making a new Fallout game is a good business decision if you don't care about what your creatives feel led to create.

 

I got inspired and decided to try out a few fountain pen inks the other day. I picked up Organics Studio's Nitrogen.

This is a popular saturated blue ink that has a lot of red sheen to it, looks almost like metallic foil when written on sufficiently ink-resistant paper.

I used it with a broad-nib TWSBI Eco. And in that, that, I agree. It does show a lot of sheen.

One really needs video to see the effect, since one needs to tilt it relative to a light source. A static image doesn't really convey the effect:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NEsHNIn1c7w&t=1460s

But there were some big caveats.

It dries out very quickly on one's nib

My big surprise was how extremely quickly the ink dried on my nib, producing a delay until the ink is flowing and a hard start after just a short time out in the air without ink flowing. People do talk about this online, now that I've gone looking for it, but I wasn't aware of it when getting the ink, and I doubt I'd have gotten it if I'd known about this going into it. One can't just stop and think for very long without needing to start writing to keep the ink flowing. For me, this is frustrating, and really kills the appeal of the ink for me. None of my other inks do this.

One really needs ink-resistant paper to see sheen

Another thing that I hadn't anticipated


not having played around with inks with a lot of sheen prior to this


is that one really needs ink-resistant paper to see the sheen. On ordinary copy paper, it just looks like a blue ink. I knew that there would be a difference, but not that there would be no sheen. On an inexpensive composition notebook I've had sitting around for probably thirty years in my desk, it looks all right, if not quite as shiny as on Iroful paper.

This probably isn't a huge surprise to people who have used inks with sheen, and it's not going to be specific to this particular sheening ink. But I'd expected some sheen to still be visible on more absorbent paper, and it isn't.

It tends to smear and get on things

In the above video, Brian Goulet does mention this and how the ink is infamous for doing this


which I find puzzling, given how quickly it seems to dry out on the nib. So I was expecting to see this. But I still managed to get smearing and blue blotches on my hands multiple times, despite being careful. I haven't seen anything like this with the other inks I've used (though I don't have a huge collection, admittedly).

Other

It has a reputation for staining clear pens. I haven't tried cleaning it out after exhausting my current fill, so no first-hand experience with this, but I thought that I'd also mention this, in case someone runs across this post when considering the ink.

Summary

The ink is pretty, if one wants something with a lot of sheen. I don't dispute that. But it really is a pain in the neck to use.

I don't know of a good "Nitrogen alternative" that performs better, but I have to say that I wouldn't recommend it to anyone unless they are aware of what they are getting into.

 

Not sure what's going on, but for at least today and yesterday, I've seen a fairly high rate of server errors when attempting to load a number of different sorts of pages. I've seen this happen with attempting to view a post (including on communities that are not locally hosted), and attempting to view user pages.

As far as I can tell, if one keeps reloading, one eventually gets through, if you're hitting this. No idea as to cause


all I see is:

Error!

There was an error on the server. Try refreshing your browser. If that doesn't work, come back at a later time. If the problem persists, you can seek help in the Lemmy support community or Lemmy Matrix room.

Sorry I can't provide any additional information, but I can't think of much other information.

An example page:

https://lemmy.today/post/55800972

This successfully showed up on, I believe, my sixth reload. The seventh reload was an error again (so it's not a "it works once and then keeps working" problem for a given page). I've seen it on various networks on my end, so I'm pretty sure that I'm not a factor.

https://lestat.org/ doesn't show errors, so whatever it is, it's not tripping their error detector.

view more: next ›