theunknownmuncher

Software would ask the OS for the age range of the user (under 13, 13-15, 16-17, 18+). The software would implement content filters based on these age ranges.

The OS is only responsible for requiring the user to set an age and providing the age range to software.

The destroyed buildings don't regrow in the spring.

Yes you have.

So this is basically just misinformation. There is no age or identity verification as part of this bill, the age is self-reported by the user and you could select any age you want. The bill requires the operating system to have users select an age when creating an account. The intention is that parents will select their child's age when setting up their child's accounts on phones and computers, to age-gate them from accessing certain software or websites.

Regardless, I don't support this feature being mandatory, because it limits parents' choices. Parents should be able to choose to disable this feature entirely or allow their children to use an OS that does not include this feature, if that is what they feel is appropriate for their child.

That’s why I always run my text through an LLM for refinement before posting it. 😉

Then why won't you say that artificial insemination IS rape?

Because it is not true.

regardless of how much you try to derail the conversation.

Actually, I'm the only one who has stayed on topic and avoided strawman arguments here.

I advocated for broadening the scope of what we call rape to more than just humans. It's anthropocentric to think that only humans can be raped.

I've never contested this. We agree on this point. Continuing to argue it is a strawman.

No, I never make personal attacks or ad hominem. The fact that you've stooped to this level shows that your argument has failed and you cannot use logic or reasoning to back it up.

What does it say that you've downvoted the message "Personal attacks are not welcome here". I think everyone should support that message.

the overwhelming majority of chatbot users run on average about 5 prompts per week, or less than one prompt per day, according to OpenAI’s own usage stats.

the overwhelming majority of chatbot users run on average about 5 prompts per week, or less than one prompt per day, according to OpenAI's own usage stats.

I have won this argument for a 2nd time because you have no other response besides "no u"

In the meantime, us vegans will keep convincing people successfully that...

Honestly, this reads as you trying to reconvince yourself. Just repeat the mantra to yourself, and the cognitive dissonance that I brought to light will go away?

any animal can be raped

True

cows who are artificially inseminated

Is not rape and you already admitted it is not equivalent to rape. Consider if you would look an actual rape victim in the face and talk to them about artificial insemination of cows as if it were rape and comparable to the real suffering they went through. I bet you wouldn't.

A lot of comments on this are saying something like "ChatGPT has stickyness and a moat because people are so familiar with it that 'asking ChatGPT' is the using-AI-verb equivalent of 'googling it'."

... Skype.