They'll never be allowed to compete head to head. It's like Formula E, that will always be enough different from Formula 1 so as to never show what a pure matchup would look like.
troed
15t/s is workable IMHO. What's your system specs? I have 96GB DDR5 but never thought about going to an ever higher MoE.
It's similar to being an assembler coder when higher level languages with compilers came. No need for management purging, you'll simply be competing for a smaller segment of assigments.
I don't know of a single developer that has actually used LLM aids say there's no benefit to them. Those that refuse do so for some other convictions and don't really know the difference between LLM aiding in tasks and full on yolo vibe coding.
Which I've done, and not a single person has looked them up. The reason for that is that no one here is actually interested in the subject - they just cannot accept their feels about humans being special snowflakes not having any support in the science.
I've sourced two of the foremost specialists on the subject. Blackmore's "Consciousness: An Introduction" amounts to a full university semester on the subject. No, I don't really see it as my job to condense that down in a post here. Anyone who's actually interested can start with reading up summaries that are available freely online instead of posting bad takes at me.
Oh I haven't seen a single person replying so far who has shown any interest in being "better informed".
Yes, as I've described here: https://blog.troed.se/posts/the-delta-between-an-llm-and-consciousness/
I didn't say human brains function like LLMs
Today's LLMs are based on a Google research paper from 2017. Another published paper that would solve this was published by Google in december last year: https://aipapersacademy.com/nested-learning-hope/
Not a single person who has commented is interested in an actual discussion regarding the science on consciousness. It's all this: https://blog.troed.se/posts/the-coming-cognitive-disbelief/
I don't care. See how easy it is? Either you're interested in the subject and you would already know that what I wrote is completely uncontroversial, or you spend time making ignorant posts because a simple fact disagrees with your feels.
The difference between you and me is that I've studied the subject. You have not. It's not on me to teach you the contents of the literature.
Go be annoying somewhere else.
I don't really care much for what you think - I already sourced two well known experts on the subject in another post in this thread.
Yeah I'm more thinking about the four wheel drive Gen 4.