Kan inte läsa materialet på något sätt som skulle innebära att Mastodon eller Lemmy skulle inkluderas. Faller både på att "små företag" exkluderas samt "civilsamhällets organisering".
IANAL
Kan inte läsa materialet på något sätt som skulle innebära att Mastodon eller Lemmy skulle inkluderas. Faller både på att "små företag" exkluderas samt "civilsamhällets organisering".
IANAL
Yeah I'm more thinking about the four wheel drive Gen 4.
They'll never be allowed to compete head to head. It's like Formula E, that will always be enough different from Formula 1 so as to never show what a pure matchup would look like.
15t/s is workable IMHO. What's your system specs? I have 96GB DDR5 but never thought about going to an ever higher MoE.
It's similar to being an assembler coder when higher level languages with compilers came. No need for management purging, you'll simply be competing for a smaller segment of assigments.
I don't know of a single developer that has actually used LLM aids say there's no benefit to them. Those that refuse do so for some other convictions and don't really know the difference between LLM aiding in tasks and full on yolo vibe coding.
Which I've done, and not a single person has looked them up. The reason for that is that no one here is actually interested in the subject - they just cannot accept their feels about humans being special snowflakes not having any support in the science.
I've sourced two of the foremost specialists on the subject. Blackmore's "Consciousness: An Introduction" amounts to a full university semester on the subject. No, I don't really see it as my job to condense that down in a post here. Anyone who's actually interested can start with reading up summaries that are available freely online instead of posting bad takes at me.
Oh I haven't seen a single person replying so far who has shown any interest in being "better informed".
Yes, as I've described here: https://blog.troed.se/posts/the-delta-between-an-llm-and-consciousness/
I didn't say human brains function like LLMs
Today's LLMs are based on a Google research paper from 2017. Another published paper that would solve this was published by Google in december last year: https://aipapersacademy.com/nested-learning-hope/
Not a single person who has commented is interested in an actual discussion regarding the science on consciousness. It's all this: https://blog.troed.se/posts/the-coming-cognitive-disbelief/
I don't care. See how easy it is? Either you're interested in the subject and you would already know that what I wrote is completely uncontroversial, or you spend time making ignorant posts because a simple fact disagrees with your feels.
Lemmy and Mbin are roughly the same thing - "Reddit"
Mastodon is "Twitter"
... and there are more, with Loops being "TikTok" and Pixelfed being "Instagram".
They can all see the same content, but presented in ways that emphasize their unique aspects. That's what people call "Fediverse" but it's much simpler to just think of them as separate apps and ignore that technically true but confusing aspect.