cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/30403895
I'm trying to wire Shelly 1PM gen 3 to my wall outlet. Is the diagram correct?
I'm trying to wire Shelly 1PM gen 3 to my wall outlet. Is the diagram correct?
For any printer. You never know what it's doing without a firewall solution. USB is always the safest option.
Why the "Flag" get removed?
Using 7900XTX with LMS. Speed are everwhere, driver dependent. With QwQ-32B-Q4_K_M, I got about 20 tok/s, with all VRAM filled. Phi-4 runs at about 30-40 tok/s. I can give more numbers if you can wait for a bit.
If you don't enjoy finding which driver works best, I strongly aginst running AMD for AI workload.
I believe the arrest did happened, but unclear what those two said in the comms, How frequent the comms were, or did in school's area. For sure missing details, and try to get readers emotional.
DLP broken? Didn't heard of that.
I think he means something like challenge-response type of auth flow that while using user/pass, the password waa never sent to the server?
True. It is just another avenue to label things.
Please allow me to have a little bit of time deep thoughts and organize myself. It might take a while, but I will give you a response.
And the lack of label just reinforced the confirmation bias.
The problem is you can't make a digital label that hard to circumvent. Much like a signature, you sign something you want to prove it is genuinely from you, but you won't sign something that's not from you while not signing things that are, especially in digital format. Digital signature can just be stripped out of the data. Watermarks on images can now patched with the help of inpainting models. Disclaimers in text can just be deleted. The default shouldn't be "This thing doesn't have an AI label so it would be written by human." The label itself it a slippery slope that helps misinformation spread faster and aid building alternate facts. Adding a label won't help people identify contents generated with ML models, but let them defer the identification to that mere label because it said so, or didn't.
Misinformation didn't spread fast simply because fascists obtained controls on medias. Just look at how China, Russia, and Iran launch misinformation campaigns. They didn't have to control those media, but some seed accounts that make sensational title that attracts people in more powerful position and recognition to spread it out. For more info on misinformation and disinformation, I recommend you watch Ryan McBeth's video on YT.
Yes, we need a way to identify what is and what not generated by ML models, but that should not be done by labeling ML contents.
(Rant)
At somepoint, HSBC decided KDE Connect installed via F-Droid is less secure.
Then it decide non-whitelisted keyborads are a security risk. Only Gboard and Samsung Keyboard is confirmed within the whitelist.
I understand the point that risk can be introduce at various points, yet this is simply too much. Yeah there are people phone infected by malware but from Play Store. Not a single time I heard one ever happened on F-Droid distributed apps, at least not from the official repo. Also, I will put more trust on an open source keyboard than any proprietary keyboard.
Furthermore, I'm shocked that an app can read my app list, and current keyboard (introduced in Android 14). This just make building a profile much easier as I belive everyone almost have an unique set of apps they like. I don't think any apps need such functionality. Why the f it needs to care what input devices I uses? This make me worry more about untold (aka burried deep in Privacy Policy) data collection.
That's for publishers, not users.