viking

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] viking@infosec.pub 1 points 1 day ago

Never had one, used one maybe 3 times in my life. I've let them run through until I heard the beep, then came over to check. Is that's not how it works?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago

Thanks, will do!

[–] viking@infosec.pub 2 points 2 days ago

Have bow and arrows ready, and they just might.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 40 points 2 days ago (2 children)

They have been contacted and responded with aggression, so they are obviously aware that they are not alone, but want to be left alone. Free will is free will.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Oh sure, thanks! I'll pop over in a sec :-)

[–] viking@infosec.pub 2 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Ah, that explains a lot. I don't want to join the main instance, nothing against it, but I've seen lemmy.world go overboard, so prefer to stick to some more "indie" instances.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 4 days ago (6 children)

Wait, your employer doesn't need to know your legal address in the US?

[–] viking@infosec.pub 16 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Piefed federates with lemmy, it's basically a clone written in python instead of rust, with advanced moderator tools, and developed by people who aren't braindead Stalinists.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 5 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Yes please! I've already joined piefed.ca to be able to support a platform without sponsoring communist propaganda, but they seem to have issues federating content properly, it takes over 24h to see new posts from Lemmy, and many discussions will be over at that point.

This very post for example is not visible there at all.

Would hope that with more instances we'd also get to see content sooner.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 3 points 6 days ago

Very strange, I'm using water straight from the kettle just after bringing it to a full boil, and don't taste anything plastic.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 4 points 6 days ago

You need it to remap some of the buttons on the side. I have the same garbage just for this purpose.

[–] viking@infosec.pub 2 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Is it an authentic aeropress, not a cheap knockoff? There are a bunch that sell under the same name but aren't in fact manufactured by aeropress ltd., and those can taste off since the cheap plastic is not certified for use with boiling water, and might not even be bpa free.

 

Hi all,

Need to pick your brains for a bit regarding best practices for handling of account recovery issues while traveling.

Premise would be that my phone gets lost or stolen, and I may not have easy access to my laptop either, and being in a foreign country I couldn't easily get a copy of the original SIM to restore via OTP.

Consequently, I also don't really love the idea of using some password manager with a master password and no F2A.

Under those circumstances, what would you consider the best way forward to ensure accessibility without crippling myself in the process?

The only thing I can come up with is a random subdomain on one of my domains, with random username and random password, where I store an encrypted container containing txt-files. Maybe even further obscured with a random cypher (all numbers / letters shifted x positions to the right or something).

But there's gotta be other use-cases out there, so I was wondering what you are using?

Ideally something that doesn't involve another person.

Thanks!

 

Hi all,

I've got a bit of a spam issue that isn't solved by either keyword or actual spam filter. The problem is that I'm in China and mass email marketing here is acceptable for some reason, so local spam filters don't catch the perps, and international ones are useless based on the language.

And since I'm in a customer/supplier facing role, quite a few genuine mails use the same keywords as the spammers, so that doesn't work to fix my problem.

However, the mails are usually sent to hundreds of people at once, all with their mail addresses in plain view in CC.

So I'd just like to set up a filter to send mails with >100 recipients or something like that straight to trash, but can't seem to find it in the outlook rule settings.

Does anyone know of a useful workaround?

Thanks!

 

I don't really use facebook anymore so couldn't care less; but so happened to log in today to change my password and saw this on my front page.

view more: ‹ prev next ›