[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Give the order comrade...check notes...Yahweh

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml -2 points 12 hours ago

When you responded to @SlothMama@lemmy.world, you said that you were against all porn.

Yes, and I also didn't suggest banning pornography or anything like that. If you think that my statement alone that I am against pornography threatens pornography as a whole, you are greatly overestimating my influence.

You simply generalized all sex work as harmful to the worker/performer.

It is a convention, at least as I understand it, that when we are talking colloquially about a phenomenon, we are talking about how that phenomenon generally happens, even if we don't use the word "generally" or something equivalent, since it is common sense that for everything there is at least one exception. If you feel like your case doesn't fit into any of the issues I've outlined, with all honesty in my heart: good for you. However, most cases are not that lucky. Exception, instead of contradicting the rule, proves it, otherwise, it would not be an exception, it would be the rule itself.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Did you understand that I defend legalization, I just don't defend it being controlled by big companies?

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 6 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

My god, the second one can be even worse. Geeks are literally the worst type of people.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml -2 points 13 hours ago

much like the failing war on drugs

It's insightful of you to associate these two problems, in fact, in that they are similar. In both cases, there is also no point in legalizing so that large companies control activities, creating, in the case of drugs, big tobacco 2.0.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml -2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

I linked an article that talks about the problem in general, two studies that talk about specific subjects and cases and an article that talks specifically about the content of porn films (I corrected the link, I was linking another text, not the one where the information originates ). There is exception for everything. Despite your individual experience, most pornography consumed does not involve direct compensation from viewers to actors to begin with. I do not aim to talk about prostitution and pornography in its entirety, but in general.

But anyway:

I was probably going to jerk off anyway

Yet, you only streamed because you needed to pay rent, or didn't you?


Also, I did not propose immediately anything that would threaten the activity in the way you practiced it,on the contrary, banning pornographic networks would possibly encourage this type of pornography. If we got to a state where most porn was like this, we would have made a huge progress.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Obviously, no censorship measure can reach all cases, especially when it comes to pornography, you can find it in every corner of the internet. But it can cover most cases if it targets the most popular sites. For example, there is a lot of child pornography on the surface web, despite it being banned in most countries, but the ban makes access difficult and guarantees punishment in any case that the law takes notice of. It is not a definitive strategy, as it aims at the effect and not the cause, but it is something.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 6 points 18 hours ago

Culture war is literally something invented by fascists, to treat it as something valid only benefits fascists.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 7 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

"Please continue to fight false conflicts invented by fascists."

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 3 points 18 hours ago

I am against porn, but this don't solve anything.

[-] whodoctor11@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Easy, they can set guidelines and block in the country sites that do not follow these guidelines.

136
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/memes@hexbear.net

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/17153232

link


I hate these ecofascists. Funded by big oil, they go around vandalizing and causing trouble for working class people while claiming to be "fighting climate change". Compare that to serious people, like the Houthi: deep unserious people.

45
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/memes@lemmygrad.ml

link


I hate these ecofascists. Funded by big oil, they go around vandalizing and causing trouble for working class people while claiming to be "fighting climate change". Compare that to serious people, like the Houthi: deep unserious people.

119
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

There's nothing more to say. It's literally the r/neoliberal post from a week ago, with some more edition because lemmy libs apparently are dumber and can't understand something unless it's spelled to them.

110
AI is a Lie. (youtu.be)
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Really surprised by this LTT video. They were direct on the points that lately, in the mainstream, there has only been rubbish.

61
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net

It is hilarious that liberals have actually appropriated the rhetoric that saying "actually, both sides are wrong" ends up favouring the "evil" side, but they continue to apply this maxim to the USSR and Nazi Germany. An inability to realize that what makes this maxim ridiculous, in the latter case, is that, in fact, it was the Soviet Union that ended fascist barbarism, while the Democratic Party and the Republican Party are two cogs in the same bellicose, anti-democratic, imperialist machine. As long as the choice is reduced to "blue vs. red" (a fake contradiction), the freedom of the human race will remain, at best, a distant dream.

But perhaps what irritates me the most is the overly pedantic use of Jim and Pam memes.

1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/music@hexbear.net
1
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/music@hexbear.net
34
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
21
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/the_dunk_tank@hexbear.net
1
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by whodoctor11@lemmy.ml to c/communism@lemmygrad.ml

I don't know if you know, but the current Hammer and Sickle is from the Khrushchev era, which is considered revisionist for any communist who values Comrade Stalin's contributions. I think it is worth changing to maintain aesthetic cohesion, as it seems to be the general line of the instance and the community.

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0

view more: next ›

whodoctor11

joined 10 months ago