[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 7 points 9 months ago

Well obviously.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 68 points 9 months ago

What I hate with this is that is defines that the army itself is good or bad. But in reality it is what it is used for. If its actually used for defence, then it's very honorable. When it's used as a tool to exploit resources to the rich, (aka generally being the aggressor), it's not.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 17 points 10 months ago

As a taller person, if this gives me sufficient legroom and a seat that actually distributes the weight over my whole thighs such that I can sit somewhat comfortable, this seems like a major upgrade to me.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 24 points 10 months ago

But he has worked as a ceo before and thus has ceo experience! /s and thus the circle (jerk) continues.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 33 points 10 months ago

Hey JT. Not a question per say, but would it be possible to make sources a bit more "front and centre" in the videos? I have a tendency to link your videos to people I try to inform and the general feedback is that they "can't just outright accept it".

Obviously you link sources / further reading in the description, which is decent. But would it be possible to make it a bit more obvious in the video themselves? As for example when statements are made in the video, make them refer to sources in the description or in some other non invasive way? As I think many don't bother to directly further investigate before they dismiss statements made, which where it seems to also end.

Hopefully that made sense. Love your content!

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 29 points 10 months ago

When the whole western society has been force fed that "we must consume else our economy will collapse", not continously outselling (and throwing away barely year old work) is bad, this is the result.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 14 points 10 months ago

This graph does what every other predictive graph does, cuts the superlinear growth short just after one year. It's guanteed to be very wrong. At some point we will have way more solar than needed and it will severely flat out, but I don't think is even close it it.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 26 points 11 months ago

Because they are releasing the same game multiple times with just a splash of paint.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 55 points 11 months ago

Those need a entirely different type of help.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 45 points 11 months ago

A cool feature would be an opt in community federation. So two aligned communities on different instances can "friend" each other and will be synonymous. If one instance disappears or one community is closed, the other will be represented as the original synced whole.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 21 points 1 year ago

This exploitative just creates burned out engineers. It's a reason total productivity has seen increasing with reduced work weeks. Well rested and happy people are vastly more efficient.

[-] ydieb@lemm.ee 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imo, any large company, even if started hardcore by linus and luke (and co), will always in the end be mostly created by all the employees.

The ownership of any large company should imo always be gradually moved over to the people who work there.

Worker coops are not a silver bullet and will always be corruptible in any way any other democracy can, but at least it has the possibility to be proper, in contrast to strict founder / investor ownership where you are at their mercy.

view more: next ›

ydieb

joined 1 year ago