89
submitted 5 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ArtVandelay@feddit.nu 14 points 5 months ago

I see a lot of ‘tax the rich’ pushes, but I’m curious on how. It’s not like billionaires get a normal salary, so I wonder what it actually is - is it taxing assets over a certain value or something?

I worked for a family office in Switzerland and the “salary” from the company to our owner was an entry level salary for compliance/presence purposes. He couldn’t care less about that being taxed.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 25 points 5 months ago

Yes, a wealth tax over a billion dollars is a proposal now. Biden's not doing it though, but 1% to 2% could raise a lot of money. Although it would require legitimate property valuations. That's hard if people just lie about their real estate like Trump was convicted of.

Also taxing capital gains over a certain amount at higher rates would help billionaires have a fair tax burden. It makes no sense to tax you a greater percentage than the owner you worked for. Above a million in capital gains should be taxed as income.

No I'm not afraid of money leaving the country. If they want to leave the most productive and profitable country on earth, that's more money for us.

[-] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

That’s hard if people just lie about their real estate like Trump was convicted of.

If they lie and inflate their property values, they get taxed more. Sounds like a win to me!

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 5 months ago

He was sued for underpaying taxes by undervaluing his property. The lies for overvaluing them on bank documents haven't been charged yet. That's a federal crime.

[-] ArtVandelay@feddit.nu 6 points 5 months ago

The Swiss actually has wealth tax, depending on canton. I believe though a lot of it is negotiable- if you’re super wealthy, I think you can agree a fixed amount per year with your canton (state).

In my canton you’re exempt from it if you have less than $250-300k in assets or something like this. And it ranges from something like 0.20-1% I believe.

[-] Badeendje@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago

At least tax loans that use stock and other "untaxes assets" as collateral as realizes gains.

Also it is kinda weird that normal people pay taxes on properties but assets like stock portfolios are not taxed.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 months ago

Remove the cap on social security taxes (160k), and the program will be fully funded in perpetuity.

Implement a wealth tax on those with, say, over 10 million in assets.

Increase the corporate tax rate to 50%, and remove all loopholes allowing them to offshore earnings.

Remove the cap on inheritance tax, as this is one of the primary drivers of wealth inequality today.

These would be a good start.

[-] Ultragigagigantic@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Make every post office a bank. The bank then gives out loans to local co-ops.

Federate the co-ops with an organizatio like Mondragon.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mondragon_Corporation

Stop coddling these faceless mega corporations. Since they are SO efficient, they wont need any breaks from the government. Invest in the people, not a 1%ers off shore bank account

this post was submitted on 27 Mar 2024
89 points (86.8% liked)

politics

18870 readers
5256 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS