this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
456 points (100.0% liked)

196

17294 readers
711 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.


Rule: You must post before you leave.



Other rules

Behavior rules:

Posting rules:

NSFW: NSFW content is permitted but it must be tagged and have content warnings. Anything that doesn't adhere to this will be removed. Content warnings should be added like: [penis], [explicit description of sex]. Non-sexualized breasts of any gender are not considered inappropriate and therefore do not need to be blurred/tagged.

If you have any questions, feel free to contact us on our matrix channel or email.

Other 196's:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] A_Very_Big_Fan@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I was high af when I wrote that, I honestly have no clue how I came to that conclusion lol

Edit: actually I think what I was thinking was it doesn't work with "they"

[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It doesn’t but at this point it should.

It’s weird and confusing to pluralize a sentence when you’re still talking about a singular individual. We should normalize “Why is they so cute?” If we refuse to make a new non-demeaning word for a singular.

I say non-demeaning because “Why is it so cute?” Is correct, but calling a living being “it” is objectifying.

[–] randint@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyz 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

I used to think that too, until I realized that verb conjugation in English is not decided by whether the subject is singular or plural. "You" can be both singular or plural, yet we always say "you are" and never "you is". Same for the pronoun "they". It's always "they are".

Unless you is also willing to normalize "you is", I think "they are" is good enough.

[–] mokus@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 11 months ago

I is willing to allow it