835
It's all correct. (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Slovene@feddit.nl 38 points 4 months ago

It wasn't his followers that killed him though. His followers did however torture and kill women.

[-] Cosmos7349@lemmy.world 53 points 4 months ago

Ya but I'm pretty sure the witches' followers didn't kill the witches either. Obviously just needed more followers. Clearly, the predominant religion is the one with the most followers willing to kill competing dark arts users. It's basically politics.

[-] pyrflie@lemm.ee 5 points 4 months ago

It depends on which witches you are talking about; 800AD+ its probably persecution, prior to that it's probably Rome clearing out Human Sacrifice cults. It's one of the major reasons Rome was so hard on ancient Briton and why Christianity had such an easy time converting Scandinavia.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 4 months ago

Many times it was to get property. If a landowner died and had no children his wife would inherit the land. If that woman were to die before remarrying and having children, then the lord of that area would get that land. If that woman were to be accused of being a witch, then that same Lord would preside over the trial and determine whether the woman was guilty of witchcraft. I think you can see a conflict of interest here.

Check the history of Luxembourg. It got so bad the Church had to step in. Now the church wasn't a great defender of women's rights, but this kind of thing got so bad even the church had to say "ok you're taking this too far."

But sometimes it was for petty reasons. Someone in town hates a woman for whatever then accusations of witchcraft were made. This is kinda anecdotal, but I got an ancestor that lived in Salem, Mass. and there was a witch trial simply because a woman got re-married to my ancestor too soon after her previous husband died.

Although the poster above made a goof by mentioning Jesus, the general sentiment of the whole witchcraft thing being about killing women for horrible (and sometimes petty) reasons seems right to me.

[-] pyrflie@lemm.ee 1 points 4 months ago

See the qualification. 800 AD is my personal cutoff for genuine action rather than persecution, but that's mostly familiarity with English and French history. Other regions likely experienced more. Though given that Luxembourg was contested territory for much of the time in question It's probably safe to apply either French or German history.

load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2024
835 points (96.9% liked)

Microblog Memes

5150 readers
578 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS