225
submitted 1 year ago by savjee@lemmy.world to c/news@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago

Vegan (or even just vegetarian) is cool, but that's small-fry compared to if we just stopped having freaking kids.

[-] pineapplelover@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

I'm doing my part. The life of one person creates so much waste and pollution.

[-] RedMarsRepublic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Well... I mean I'm not having kids either, but someone has to to continue the species, nobody needs to eat meat.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

someone has to to continue the species

Why?

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

"Willful extinction" is not a productive way to end climate change.

You won't convince people, so it's DOA, but it's also philosophically weak in the face of alternative views. Alternatives which also theoretically have humans in them and don't obliterate the environment exist, meaning you are on the back foot here to justify an anthropocentric philosophy.

"Why do you think people should exist?" Can be an interesting discussion, but as an argument it's not a great one.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

You won’t convince people

I don't have to. Birth rates in the developed world are plummeting.

And unless I'm mistaken, you are the one trying to convince people right now.

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Birth rates are plummeting to maintain what will probably be around 13 billion. That's wildly distinct from willful extinction.

I... What? You made a post saying people should do x, I responded. Yeah we're both trying to convince people of a thing, I'm not sure I see how that is actually relevant.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

“[S]omeone has to to continue the species” —~~you, not me~~ someone else

[-] Umbrias@beehaw.org 0 points 1 year ago

I did not, in fact, say that.

[-] argv_minus_one@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

I see. Apologies for the confusion.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

You won’t convince people, so it’s DOA

That pretty much sums up any approach by humans to do something about what's happening to the planet. Anything anyone throws out is realistically DOA.

[-] sin_free_for_00_days@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

There's nothing inherently bad about eating meat. We've been doing it for 100s of thousands of years. It's that there are too many freaking people. I judge people way more when I see them with offspring, then I do their dietary consumption.

[-] dreadedchalupacabra@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

And that is microscopic compared to levying massive fines on businesses that don't go carbon neutral and passing global laws to protect the amazon and MESS UP any government that toys with it.

this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
225 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22057 readers
218 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS