437
me🛒irl (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago

Capitalism bad on lemmy of course...

But Capitalism doesn't inherently optimize out ethics. It just tries to optimize out anything that gets in the way of profit.

When being ethical is profitable, companies will be ethical. Many companies are maximizing profits by making ethical decisions solely because doing so keeps their customers purchasing their products instead of their competitors' products.

I'd argue that this is a newer feature of Capitalism as well. So it's accidentally optimizing IN more ethics when compared to 100 years ago.

I think it's more accurate to say that Capitalism is indifferent to ethics rather than to say Capitalism optimizes it out.

[-] franklin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

To me that's a different road to the same answer because it's almost always advantageous to be unethical, see the correlation between sociopathic tendencies and Fortune 500 company CEOs.

[-] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

That's why I differentiate between publicly traded and privately owned companies. In the former, if the CEO's ethics are stopping profits, they get kicked out. In the latter, if the CEO/owner happens to be a nice guy, it can have an impact on the company as a whole.

[-] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm more talking about the ethics of the consumers being factored into the profit equation, which has a very real impact on today's corporate profits.

Not the CEO. Those guys are sociopaths.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
437 points (97.8% liked)

me_irl

4389 readers
384 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS