437
me🛒irl (lemmy.world)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] franklin@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago

To me that's a different road to the same answer because it's almost always advantageous to be unethical, see the correlation between sociopathic tendencies and Fortune 500 company CEOs.

[-] Chrobin@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago

That's why I differentiate between publicly traded and privately owned companies. In the former, if the CEO's ethics are stopping profits, they get kicked out. In the latter, if the CEO/owner happens to be a nice guy, it can have an impact on the company as a whole.

[-] GlitterInfection@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I'm more talking about the ethics of the consumers being factored into the profit equation, which has a very real impact on today's corporate profits.

Not the CEO. Those guys are sociopaths.

this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2024
437 points (97.8% liked)

me_irl

4383 readers
364 users here now

All posts need to have the same title: me_irl it is allowed to use an emoji instead of the underscore _

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS