1085
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I think you're a Nazi or similar and that's why you're so upset.

No actual thinking would lead you to that conclusion.

You probably believe this too. Unless you think laws against conspiracy and planning mass murder are a bad idea.

Announcing a desire/plan to commit crimes should lead to arrest. Not vigilantism by random citizens.

Identifying as a literal Nazi is planning mass murder with extra steps.

Despite your violent fantasies, even if I conceded that, the response to such is arrest and imprisonment, not vigilante mob violence by random schmucks on the street.

Do you truly not understand the path you're setting out on, once you start advocating for vigilantism?

The grand irony is that you've basically announced here that you're willing to commit unprovoked assault on strangers. By your very logic, others are justified in beating you up for desiring to commit violent acts!

This is a non sequitur that I guess is meant to sound profound.

Non sequitur? Following "the left believes in basic rights for all, even people they hate" with "the left do not believe some people deserve to have the basic right not to be assaulted" makes pointing out that rights are not conditional, VERY relevant.

It'd be more respectable if you simply admitted the hypocrisy, and that "the left believes in basic rights for all, even people they hate" is a straight-up lie.

Since you don't seem to understand what "rights" are: if it doesn't apply to EVERYONE at ALL TIMES, it's not a "right". Anything called a "right" that has conditions is not actually a right.

[-] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 0 points 6 months ago
I think you’re a Nazi or similar and that’s why you’re so upset.

No actual thinking would lead you to that conclusion.

You seem awfully eager to defend nazis. If you were a nazi or closely allied, it would make sense for you to act as such. Thinking! Also you keep talking about "the left" as if you're not a member, which sure makes you sound like a right-winger.

Announcing a desire/plan to commit crimes should lead to arrest. Not vigilantism by random citizens.

Wearing a nazi uniform or otherwise espousing their ideals is announcing a desire to commit crimes. Perhaps in a perfect world, we could delegate to the state's monopoly on force. But some of those who burn crosses, etc. Additionally, passive acceptance of nazis emboldens them and endangers everyone. So, no. Vigilantism by random citizens is appropriate in response to "yo i want to kill a whole lot of people" declarations.

The grand irony is that you’ve basically announced here that you’re willing to commit unprovoked assault on strangers. By your very logic, others are justified in beating you up for desiring to commit violent acts!

It's not unprovoked.

Since you don’t seem to understand what “rights” are: if it doesn’t apply to EVERYONE at ALL TIMES, it’s not a “right”. Anything called a “right” that has conditions is not actually a right.

That's not how rights work. You have freedom of assembly, but you can't parade into your neighbor's bedroom at 3am. Rights intersect.

Also you're being thoroughly savaged in the rest of these comments, and I have happier things to spend my time on.

[-] damnedfurry@lemmy.world -1 points 6 months ago

You seem awfully eager to defend nazis.

I'm not defending Nazis, I'm attacking hypocrisy, and a particular type of which that is known to HELP Nazis (and any other extremists of the same type) in the long term. Experts on extremist movements agree on this, and even former members of such groups say it's true. I've detailed all of this in a previous comment of mine, look under the break/line.

Also you keep talking about "the left" as if you're not a member

I'm not. Most of my positions are left-wing, but I have no interest in considering myself a "member" of any political collective, and it's precisely because of bullshit like this. I can espouse the values I believe in without having to be on a 'team'. And doing so insulates me from being associated with the stupid shit my would-be 'team' does. It becomes an especially prudent tactic as collectives grow more radicalized, while I don't.

I also hate stereotyping and generalizing, so collectivism in general puts me off.

Wearing a nazi uniform or otherwise espousing their ideals is announcing a desire to commit crimes.

The proper response is still arrest, not vigilante violence from randoms.

Vigilantism by random citizens is appropriate in response to "yo i want to kill a whole lot of people" declarations.

Hard disagree. The evidence is clear--doing this is equivalent to prioritizing the dopamine rush that comes with feeling like you're the hero beating up the villain, over the actual reduction of harmful ideologies. You feeling good is not more valuable than eliminating Nazism, sorry.

It's not unprovoked.

Then neither is it when someone beats you up for advocating beating others up. You provoked them by saying you're willing to attack them.

Look at the comment I linked. Read the account of the former white supremacist, especially. You are playing right into their hands. Stop being so gullible.

thoroughly savaged

Sticking fingers in ears and deciding I must be a Nazi, because you don't like the facts, is only "savaged" in a deeply deluded mind.

this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
1085 points (96.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5695 readers
2721 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS