284
submitted 2 months ago by ylai@lemmy.ml to c/gaming@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Overwatch wasn't good either.

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 0 points 2 months ago

You're entitled to your opinion, but it was a very popular and well-loved game by many. O2? Not so much.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago

If overwatch was so good why didn't they make overwatch 2 good

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago
[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 0 points 2 months ago

good games make more money than bad games so clearly you're wrong

[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

Not really true. While there are lots of factors in how profitable a game is, the biggest one is marketing. Regardless of how good it is. Brand name recognition. Like any other industry. It's why games like CoD and Assassin's Creed are ridden the fuck to death despite continuously getting worse.

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee -1 points 2 months ago
[-] helenslunch@feddit.nl 1 points 2 months ago

Hmm, you make a convincing argument...

[-] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 1 points 2 months ago

another win for me :)

[-] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Because it was made as an excuse to fully transition to a f2p business model. It wasn't a game anyone was asking for and the only way they could get people to use it over the first one was by shutting the first one down. It was their way of pushing enshitification.

this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2024
284 points (96.7% liked)

Gaming

19181 readers
321 users here now

Sub for any gaming related content!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS