11
Gopher-commerce: a proposal?
(phroxy.z3bra.org)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
11 points (100.0% liked)
Mostly RFC1436 compliant
236 readers
1 users here now
Welcome to the gopher renaissance
Some useful gopher services:
- Wikipedia front-end
gopher://gopherpedia.com - Reddit front-end
gopher://gopherddit.com
Discover new places:
gopher://i-logout.cz/1/bongustagopher://gopher.black/1/moku-ponagopher://gopher.clubgopher://tildeverse.org
Web proxies:
- https://gopher.floodgap.com/gopher/gw.lite?=sdf.org+70+31
- https://gopher.tildeverse.org/tildeverse.org
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
IMO you shouldn't try to replace the web with gopher. For me it had a single purpose: share files. If you want to make a payment, you shouldn't use gopher as it's simply not meant for that. It should probably be a different protocol for that, something peer-to-peet rather than centralized like gopher is ?
As for encryption, there were some proposal to add it to gopher (and working ones!). IMO the best way would be to do encryption at the network level rather than at the protocol. But we're far from here :)
How is gopher centralized?
My gopher hole is hosted on a single server, and to access it, everyone has to connect to it. This is opposed to the concept of decentralization you can have in IPFS for example, where I would publish a phlog entry directly from my computer, and you'd connect directly to my computer to get it. Then we have two copies on the network (yours and mine), so anyone can grab either of this copies to retrieve it. It's decentralized in the sense that you are not forced to grab the content from a central place.
Note that centralization isn't bad per se. Gopher is centralized, it's a fact, but it's not necessarily bad. For stuff like payment, relying on a central place isn't ideal though because you must rely and trust a 3rd party to handle your money.