76
submitted 3 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SandbagTiara2816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 months ago

Morons. Imagine turning down funding to improve your state to score political points. I feel for the people who live there that don’t support DeSantis - they didn’t ask for this, and yet they have to suffer from the poor decision making of their fellow citizens.

[-] admiralteal@kbin.social 9 points 3 months ago

The dumbest thing is that some of the best greenfield urbanism in the country is in Florida (places like Seaside, which may be failing on their promise but are at least trying to do the right thing). They're building first-class high-speed rail (no, Brightline isn't really private -- they function only because of vast support from the FL government). They have huge solar buildouts that are certain to continue scaling up simply by market forces. All things that, on paper, could look like they were totally climate-motivated even though they really are business-oriented.

And yeah, they also have things running opposite to all of this. Florida IS objectively the worst urban/transportation design in the country. They're committing to use more fossil fuels for literally no reason other than Desantis's war on woke. They're forcing/subsidizing insurance companies in order to keep vulnerable people living in places that won't even exist in the coming years/decades.

Even still, they have tons of things that could be part of a "climate action plan" which are just activities they are already doing. They could be real schmucks here and take the money without changing any behavior. They're refusing to do so for entirely partisan reasons.

And the truth is, Desantis is (politically) right to do so. Once that transition money started coming in, it will built constituencies for renewable projects and emissions-reducing operations. It will motivate people and money to do the right thing, and in so doing create more inertia for doing the right thing. As the actual people of Florida experienced tiny, visible improvements to their lives motivated by this money, they'd become more open to the idea of doing more of it -- weakening the power of the anti-science authoritarian right that currently run roughshod on the state. To a dictator, any loss of power is an injustice that must be avoided at all costs.

[-] flicker@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Imagine turning down funding to improve your state to score political points.

I'm in a state that refused to expand Medicare for the poor. Feels bad.

this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
76 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4916 readers
515 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS