172
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] nohaybanda@hexbear.net 35 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

I kinda feel weโ€™re shooting ourselves in the foot with the 99% Hitler line. The crime of genocide has a legal definition, one which does not define a population threshold or number which must be destroyed before it counts.

Biden is committing genocide. If Trump won and proceeded to intensify the killing, murdering twice as many, that would not be two genocides or a double genocide. The only thing that would double is the number of US presidents guilty of conducting genocide against the people of Palestine. Or the ones conducting this particular escalation, to be more precise. All previous ones are also guilty and history did not begin on October 7

[-] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 23 points 5 months ago

99% Hitler does not mean "not committing genocide" and genocides can indeed be larger or smaller, and more or less "complete".

[-] AmarkuntheGatherer@lemmygrad.ml 11 points 5 months ago

When it comes to the people who see a genuine difference between the corpse of a fascist and the orange of a fascist, it really doesn't make a difference what we say. They look at current events and say "this is what Trump's usia/living unders socialism looks like." They're so divorced from reality that they aren't convinced of what the best recorded genocide of all time truly is.

this post was submitted on 03 May 2024
172 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13474 readers
792 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS