1007
submitted 4 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] breetai@lemmy.world -3 points 4 months ago

A 30% flax tax is higher than the mythical 90%.

The 90% range had so many deductions only 1 person hit it and even then it’s only on the income that exceeds that limit.

A 30% flat tax with no deductions is much more brutal to income but it’s fair.

[-] lewdian69@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

Ahhh you aren't using the current definition of "flat tax". Flat tax is a single rate across all incomes. It still includes deductions, exemptions, credits etc.

I don't know the correct term for "no deductions tax". No exceptions? Non adjustable?

Your bracket concept is how it works now.

[-] breetai@lemmy.world -4 points 4 months ago

Flat means no deductions and an equal pay. It can still be done against brackets and be a flat tax.

No brackets work with credits and deductions. Someone with 100k in income could pay zero in taxes. A flat tax makes them pay taxes by removing deductions.

Personally I’d rather see a consumption tax but that freaks most people out.

[-] lewdian69@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

"A flat tax is a tax with a single rate on the taxable amount, after accounting for any deductions or exemptions from the tax base. It is not necessarily a fully proportional tax." Wikipedia

[-] breetai@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

It’s however the law wants to define it. All the bills I’ve seen pushed are a flat rate with no deductions.

Have you seen anyone propose a flax tax with deductions? I have not.

https://www.investopedia.com/terms/f/flattax.asp#:~:text=Key%20Takeaways%201%20A%20flat%20tax%20applies%20the,sales%20tax%20are%20a%20type%20of%20flat%20tax.

Employing a flat tax means that taxpayers cannot take deductions or exemptions.

[-] lewdian69@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Interesting! I had never heard that definition before. It's always been a single rate across the board with deductions still included whenever I've heard it discussed. I'll believe it though. Investopedia, while focused on the greediest of society, at least knows economics.

edit: weird words changed. swipe keyboard got the best of me.

[-] breetai@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I’ve never heard deductions being allowed. Maybe a few but for the most part it’s about an equal rate across everyone or at least a few small brackets.

Different plans define income differently. If we are trying to fix the astern income should be everything. Selling an investment home, dividends, selling stocks, w2. Etc.

this post was submitted on 04 May 2024
1007 points (98.6% liked)

politics

18863 readers
5153 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS