777
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 89 points 7 months ago

Naw, naw, it's cool... see, surely their income went up 30% in 5 years, right?... Right?

[-] Fester@lemm.ee 39 points 7 months ago

They did not, but it’s ok because they’re just feeling it wrong this year. Maybe someone should tell them how to feel about the economy so their income and expenses won’t matter anymore.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

But we matched inflation last year! That means everything's okay now doesn't it? The inflation from previous years just goes away!

[-] MutilationWave@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

And it's totally not an average skewed higher by higher paying jobs right?. Us working class people didn't get shit. I listened to a nurse the other day complain that they were only getting cost of living adjustments instead of a "real raise." Like holy shit a lot of us got nothing. I'm making the same thing as I was during the pandemic and my money is worth the equivalent of $6 less per hour due to inflation.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world -3 points 7 months ago

We beat inflation

https://www.bls.gov/news.release/eci.nr0.htm

Check the constant dollar column, all positive

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

You should really read your sources. The chart is not inflation adjusted. The report tells you the 12 month inflation adjusted figure.

Inflation-adjusted wages and salaries increased 0.8 percent for the 12 months ending March 2024.

Oh yeah we beat the pants off inflation! Whew baby! Oh by the way, there's still the preceding years of wild fucking inflation to make back. As well as the decades of stagnant wages versus inflation.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

I did read my sources, because when I said we beat inflation, that's what my source says

Decades of stagnant wages

Good news, we had more than a decade of growing wages (the COVID spike is due to compositional effects)

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

A. You don't know how medians work. In a set of [1,1,1,1,5,8,9,9,9] 5 is the median. But you wouldn't say that's representative of the average worker. You're looking for the mode. Which would be 1 in that data set.

B. .8 percent is not the hot news you're looking for.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago

5 is more representative than the mode, since it does show that about half make more and half made less

1 is ignoring the rest of the data completely

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

If this was a representative sample the ones would have rebelled already. This is a teaching example.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world -1 points 7 months ago

Not really, if the 1 is $100,000, should they feel worse than the $500,000 and above?

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

The 1 is not 100,000 and you know it.

[-] iopq@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, but my point is not everyone should be equal, everyone should have enough money to live

Those are very different goals

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Did I say we should make everyone live on the exact same income?

For giggles though if we distributed our GDP equally it would be about 106,000 after the government budget is taken out. And that's without accounting for not having to pay Medicaid/SSI/SSDI/etc... anymore.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago

Lesse... in 2020 we had a .5% CoL and up to 2% performance because of economic uncertainty... most people didn't notice because of CERB (Canadian PPP)... In 2021 there were concerns about economic stagnation so it was a 1% CoL and up to 1.3% raise. 2022 we had a bad sales year (commissions were supplemented to retain sales) so 1% CoL, up to 1% raise and .75% bonus. And this year our PE firm is clamping down so 1.5% CoL, .5% performance raise and a 1% bonus due to continued inflation grumbling.

[-] canihasaccount@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago
[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 24 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

951 to 1136, Q1 2020 to Q1 2024.

+19.45% from Q1 2020, which doesn't help you if rent is +30% and inflation in general hit +9%.

Q1 2019 was 899, so +26%, a little closer.

But the REAL problem is workers don't see that gain unless they change jobs. Working the same job year after year you're lucky to get 4% per year.

[-] frezik@midwest.social 4 points 7 months ago

+19.45% from Q1 2020, which doesn't help you if rent is +30% and inflation in general hit +9%.

Which means workers are making more overall. You don't pay just rent, but a complete basket of goods. If wages are up 19% while the basket of goods is up 9%, then workers have more money in their pocket.

There will often be some individual thing that sticks out in the basket. If not rent, then maybe food. If not food, then maybe energy. That can tell us where to focus policy to reduce inflation. It doesn't tell us that workers make less money in real terms.

But the REAL problem is workers don't see that gain unless they change jobs. Working the same job year after year you're lucky to get 4% per year.

This is a big problem. Companies do not value loyalty.

this post was submitted on 12 May 2024
777 points (98.7% liked)

News

23659 readers
3151 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS