639
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] 5too@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It's also not specified as not flammable!

(Also, does it still use animal fat or something as a material component? That's why we decided it was)

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 8 points 5 months ago

It is specifed as automatic, systematic and hydromatic, though.

[-] RavenFellBlade@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

But only when combined with lightning.

[-] JackbyDev@programming.dev 3 points 5 months ago

It's a totally fine ruling to say it's flammable. I'm just saying the spell itself doesn't say it is. I think treating it like Alchemist's Fire once ignited is a good house rule. (1d4 damage at the start of each of its turns and can use an action to attempt to extinguish with a DC 10 Dexterity check.)

this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2024
639 points (97.6% liked)

Microblog Memes

5937 readers
4711 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS