The train crash is you not replying to the most recent message in our conversation.
You've been making an argument against the idea that people shouldn't talk about things they don't want to then be upset and say they like dislike small talk when I suggested they should instead either say nothing or talk about a topic they actually want to. You said you were answering the "if you really don't care, why ask" part, and when I clarified that I was specifically saying to instead pick something you do care about the answer to (instead of picking something you'll hate talking about and then complain about it, which is what that post you replied to was saying). I even reiterated. You even said it's not something you want to do. So, I don't really understand you when you say that you believe you've never made a big deal about hating small talk. The whole time I've been saying to just pick something you wanna talk about instead and you have disagreed with it as well as said you don't want to do it. To me that certainly sounds like you're saying you dislike small talk.
Maybe work on communicating your thoughts more clearly, because I don't know how you expected me to think anything differently from the course of this discussion. It sounds like we agree, but you're just intent on making it into a disagreement for some odd reason. It's like you only read the first part of that first post and ignored the end and wanted to make me out to be someone who thinks they're above talking to blue collar workers.
I've never suggested people shouldn refuse to engage in small talk, only that if they genuinely hate small talk, they shouldn't feel obligated to strike up a conversation, or that they should actually choose a topic they want to talk about instead of choosing ones they don't want to talk about and then complaining that they're talking about something they don't want to talk about.
Talking to someone about a topic you specifically say you don't enjoy talking about only for the hopes that they'll give you freebies isn't nice, it's actually pretty shitty. Like you view the purpose of a social interaction as a gamble to win a prize. Mind you, if you didn't make such a fuss about hating the process of small talk, I wouldn't think that, but because you say it's something you don't want to be engaging in, I don't see how else to view what you're saying as some strange transactional thing instead of human to human connection.
And no, I don't refuse to speak to cashiers. If they talk to me, I answer. If there's something I actually want to say, then I say it. I follow blue collar workers around my house so I can learn about what they're doing because I'm curious. Don't frame this as some sort of elitist snobbery when all I said was that if you don't want to talk to someone about something that you either shouldn't talk at all or choose a different topic you actually want to talk about.
What "benefit" does "someone in charge of all the money" being able to "evaluate your mental and emotional state" give you? And how would you expect me to take such a line of reasoning other than you having a paranoia about someone scamming you?
If you think a cashier is going to scam you because you don't talk to them then I think you have some serious trust issues.
You don't need to talk to them at all. A cashier does not need to "evaluate your mental and emotional state." If you don't want to, don't do it.
Then ask about something you do want to talk about if you want to talk? It's not like it's impossible.
I never said not to though, lmao, I said to pick something you actually want to talk about.
I'll muddy the waters further by saying I'm an introvert (and not in the shy way, the same way you describe it) but still define it as light conversation, not unimportant conversation I don't care about the answers to.
That helps explain why it feels divided though, thanks for sharing the actual definitions.
You're not missing too much. There's sort of a set of customs most servers have as well that are counter intuitive to new users. What's frustrating is that most mods are so used to them that they forget how unobvious they are.
And you're welcome to keep refusing to believe that sharing fun facts with people can be small talk, no skin off me. Also it feels odd to that you accuse me of mental gymnastics to hold an absolute belief, when other people here define the same conversational patterns and topics as small talk when it's with people they don't wanna talk to, but some other mystery thing when it's with people they do want to talk to. Not sure what is more gymnastics than that.
8
[SOLVED] Bug in 1.5 during bestow ceremony, my royal doesn't go, any ideas? (Logs attached!)
(gist.github.com)
YES, I did solve this post as I was writing it. YES, I am still going to post it. THE PROBLEM WAS THAT THERE WAS A CHESS TABLE IN FRONT OF MY THRONE. This does not prevent people from using the throne, but during the bestow ceremony they need that spot apparently.
Relevant snippet of logs below. The link has the entirety that got uploaded.
First, I am playing with mods, but even after I disable literally all mods and start this quest fresh to do the bestow ceremony it still does this, so I don't think it's the mods. Also as the title says this is 1.5. If I was playing on 1.6 I would upload these to a more official source.
When I tell my royal to begin the bestow ceremony, he just idles. Nobody else reacts to join, they just keep doing whatever. He just sits there, frozen in time. I let the game run for ~12 hours (in-game) and he still hadn't moved.
Searching around this seems to be somewhat of a known bug, but I'm not seeing anything about these logs specifically. I have tried calling the bestower in multiple times and each time he freezes. Even when I do the "cancel ceremony" and call them back later it does the same thing. Even when I remove all the optional spectators it does this.
In the bottom right you can see Grump idling. In the bottom left you can see that he is trying to attend the bestow ceremony. In the top left you can see the bestower waiting.
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Unay
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Grill
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Prosecco
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Herc
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Dani
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Marty
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Lion
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837199) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Isarita
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Lynx
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Gillespie
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Prosecco
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837443) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837531) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Wingman
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
Failed to find a spectator spot for Rofro
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837775) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5838023) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5838272) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
(Filename: ./Runtime/Export/Debug/Debug.bindings.h Line: 39)
More in depth log message about the TryMakePreToilReservations().
TryMakePreToilReservations() returned false for a non-queued job right after StartJob(). This should have been checked before. pawn = Grump, curJob = BestowingCeremony (Job_5837036) A = Thing_Human922515 Giver = JobGiver_BestowingCeremony [workGiverDef: null]
UnityEngine.StackTraceUtility:ExtractStackTrace ()
Verse.Log:Warning (string)
(wrapper dynamic-method) MonoMod.Utils.DynamicMethodDefinition:Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker.StartJob_Patch1 (Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker,Verse.AI.Job,Verse.AI.JobCondition,Verse.AI.ThinkNode,bool,bool,Verse.ThinkTreeDef,System.Nullable`1<Verse.AI.JobTag>,bool,bool,System.Nullable`1<bool>,bool,bool,bool)
Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker:CheckForJobOverride_NewTemp (single,bool)
Verse.AI.Pawn_JobTracker:CheckForJobOverride (single)
RimWorld.LordToil_BestowingCeremony_Perform:UpdateAllDuties ()
Verse.AI.Group.Lord:GotoToil (Verse.AI.Group.LordToil)
Verse.AI.Group.Transition:Execute (Verse.AI.Group.Lord)
Verse.AI.Group.Transition:CheckSignal (Verse.AI.Group.Lord,Verse.AI.Group.TriggerSignal)
Verse.AI.Group.Lord:CheckTransitionOnSignal (Verse.AI.Group.TriggerSignal)
Verse.AI.Group.Lord:ReceiveMemo (string)
RimWorld.LordToil_BestowingCeremony_Wait:StartRitual (System.Collections.Generic.List`1<Verse.Pawn>)
RimWorld.LordToil_BestowingCeremony_Wait:<ExtraFloatMenuOptions>b__7_1 (RimWorld.RitualRoleAssignments)
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginRitual:<Start>g__InnerStart|38_0 ()
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginRitual:Start ()
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginLordJob:DoButtonRow (Verse.RectDivider&,bool)
RimWorld.Dialog_BeginLordJob:DoWindowContents (UnityEngine.Rect)
(wrapper dynamic-method) MonoMod.Utils.DynamicMethodDefinition:Verse.Window.InnerWindowOnGUI_Patch0 (Verse.Window,int)
UnityEngine.GUI:CallWindowDelegate (UnityEngine.GUI/WindowFunction,int,int,UnityEngine.GUISkin,int,single,single,UnityEngine.GUIStyle)
5
[Solved] When uploading media to Discord, Google Photos is no longer showing in "browse media in other apps" on my Pixel 6.
(programming.dev)
It only shows Drive (for each account), Bug Reports (?) and System Traces (?). Of course, I just restarted my phone to see if it fixed it. It did, but as soon as I try a second time it's gone again.
I mention Discord but I'm pretty sure this file picker screen is not directly associated with Discord.
Update: This is affecting a friend of mine as well in the same way from the same time. Haven't determined if it's just Discord yet.
Update 2: Alright, if I scroll to the photos instead of selecting "files" then go to "all albums" I see Google Photos. Not sure what changed to make it like this but at least now I know.
view more: next ›
Yeah, this post is just misogynistic.