65
Electric cars (slrpnk.net)
submitted 1 year ago by thisfro@slrpnk.net to c/fuck_cars@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

As much as I hate cars, removing them is only possible inside cities. North America has a very large rural area(and population) that needs to be converted away from fossil fuels.

[-] Habnab@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Trains are not financially viable for rural areas.

[-] bulbasaur@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Cars are not ecologically viable for life to continue on planet earth

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

That's a pretty shit argument. Humans are not ecologically viable for life to continue on planet earth at our current population, even if we remove all cars.

[-] bulbasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah no, that's Malthusian shit you're arguing. It's not equivalent to degrowth

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 year ago

Yea no what? We are already setting population targets via immigration right now, the question is about what the target should be (and why) not whether or not to do it.

[-] bulbasaur@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

To do what? Limit immigration so that poor ppl from countries we immiserated, exploited, and put in danger of climate collapse from our overconsumption can die? Sounds like nazi shit to me

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

Wat? Should we just let anyone who wants to live in Canada do so? That sounds a lot like suicide to me.

Setting a fixed population target for optimized citizen benefit of available resources and then bringing in immigrants to make up for the birth shortfall seems like a fairly sensible option. It's not like our immigration would be "low" even if we did that, though it wouldn't be as high as it currently is it would still be hundreds of thousands of people per year.

[-] bulbasaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Ppl from the global south have to immigrate bc of the plundering, immiseration, political violence, and climate catastrophe caused by colonial imperialist global north countries like Canada. You're advancing a fascist position, to force your country's victims to die so you can continue to live in undeserved privileged luxury

https://readsettlers.org/

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 year ago

You can fuck right off with that nonsense.

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Yes it is. We hunted multiple animals to extinction and poisoned vast stretches of land long before the industrial revolution, we didn't need cars to be assholes to nature.

[-] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

North America has a large suburban population. The rural population is almost entirely dependent on fossil fuels for the near future because of infrastructure scarcity and the energy density of fossil fuels.

[-] thisfro@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe yes, but a large part of society at least in America and Europe live in cities or suburbs, where cars are just bs

[-] BlameThePeacock@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I completely agree with you on that one. Unfortunately I'm one of those rural people.

I'm banking on autonomous busing in hopes that we can eventually drop to one vehicle, we already have bus service but it's only 1/hour to the nearest little town, and only 3/day to the nearest city(commuting busses @ $20 round trip per day)

We did buy an EV though for cost and environmental reasons (I live somewhere with a 99% clean grid)

this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2023
65 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

9782 readers
4 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS