355

Nvidia is now worth $102M per employee (sherwood.news)

submitted 2 months ago by sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz to c/technology@lemmy.world

39 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I know this is more business than tech related, but for some reason I am not able to post it to the business community, so I'm posting it here.

"...For Nvidia, after this latest run-up took it north of the $3T milestone, the company is being valued at more than $100M for each of its 29,600 employees (per its filing that counted up to the end of Jan 2024).

That’s more than 5x any of its big tech peers, and hundreds of times higher than more labor-intensive companies like Walmart and Amazon. It is worth noting that Nvidia has very likely done some hiring since the end of January — I think the company might be in growth mode — but even if the HR department has been working non-stop, Nvidia will still be a major outlier on this simple measure.

We are running out of ways to describe Nvidia’s recent run... but a nine-figure valuation per employee is a new one."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Personally I'm an AMD guy, I don't like the proprietary approach Nvidia takes to everything.
But I have to admit, Nvidia has been on the ball for 30 years now, and it's very impressive what they have achieved.
I think the rest of the industry needs to pool together around an open standard, if they want to have a chance to compete against the near monopoly Nvidia has because of CUDA.

[-] Cocodapuf@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Is there anything fundamentally superior about Cuda over open CL?

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 months ago

Yes: market share. And Nvidia has the top performing cards on the market, so there's no reason to go with a competitor.

[-] Cort@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

And inertia. Same reason x86/64 is still the king. Nobody wants to update their software to a new architecture

[-] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago

Exactly. People will do it if there's a big enough incentive, but that just doesn't exist for openCL.

[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

I am not an AI programmer so I can't really say. But CUDA had a head start and was some years ago allegedly the best combo with Nvidia hardware for AI programming. Over a period of time a lot of companies/projects have come to use CUDA, and so it has an advantage both for compatibility and know how among many AI programmers.

It's kind of like how X86 has maintained a market lead on desktops and servers, despite ARM being very competitive. The change of API is disruptive and costly, so people stay with what already works.

this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2024

355 points (96.6% liked)

Technology

57226 readers

4494 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each another!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS