863
luv me rover, 'ate me small richard
(files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
863 points (97.6% liked)
okmatewanker
551 readers
54 users here now
No foul language - i.e. French 🤮
Obviously satire, dozy wankers
founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
Does anyone with any particular body characteristic overcompensate by purchasing a land rover or it it just meant to mock them by associating them with something they, and the person making the association, perceive as negative?
I think the idea is that if you feel the need to have a powerful status symbol like a Range Rover or a Porsche then the only explanation is that you just desire the status symbol of "Big Man". The old joke is then that they feel the need to be a big man because they feel ashamed about something else like having a small willy.
So you're saying that it's shameful to have a small penis and it's OK to look down on people based on their penis size?
That's the assertion your theory is dependent on.
I know it's rare to think about things we say often but really try and think about it, it's a dumb thing to say and continuing it simply because it's commonly said would be really dumb - not everyone with a small penis is a rage filled monster but forcing these cruel assertions that someone with a small penis is likely to be the sort of loser that drives a Porsche does make it more likely someone with a small penis will fixate on it and suffer social anxiety because of it.
I know fully well that's the case, that's why I described it as "the theory" and "the old joke" rather than saying it's what I think or that I think it's correct.
Good to hear, then my comment is directed at anyone who uses this excuse or makes such jokes.