864
luv me rover, 'ate me small richard
(files.catbox.moe)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2024
864 points (97.6% liked)
okmatewanker
596 readers
3 users here now
No foul language - i.e. French 🤮
Obviously satire, dozy wankers
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Girls with small titties don't overcompensate by buying land rovers
Does anyone with any particular body characteristic overcompensate by purchasing a land rover or it it just meant to mock them by associating them with something they, and the person making the association, perceive as negative?
I think the idea is that if you feel the need to have a powerful status symbol like a Range Rover or a Porsche then the only explanation is that you just desire the status symbol of "Big Man". The old joke is then that they feel the need to be a big man because they feel ashamed about something else like having a small willy.
So you're saying that it's shameful to have a small penis and it's OK to look down on people based on their penis size?
That's the assertion your theory is dependent on.
I know it's rare to think about things we say often but really try and think about it, it's a dumb thing to say and continuing it simply because it's commonly said would be really dumb - not everyone with a small penis is a rage filled monster but forcing these cruel assertions that someone with a small penis is likely to be the sort of loser that drives a Porsche does make it more likely someone with a small penis will fixate on it and suffer social anxiety because of it.
I know fully well that's the case, that's why I described it as "the theory" and "the old joke" rather than saying it's what I think or that I think it's correct.
Good to hear, then my comment is directed at anyone who uses this excuse or makes such jokes.
What about girls with huge pussies?
Huge pussies buy AR50s