Median is the middle point of the population and has its place when the range doesn't skew too much. I think a good representation of income is by percentages, as in "90% of people make $x,000 or below". This chart had dated (2010) data but its a better representation than I've found elsewhere 1000002576

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Massive skews and tails are why you use median.

[–] afk_strats@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Its median is tool for understanding data but it doesn't paint a complete picture and can't be representative without other context. For example, if you have a bimodal distribution, the median doesn't tell you much just how like the average doesn't tell you much. There are other examples like this.

[–] bamfic@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

what? the mode is $15k/yr?

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Whole lot of wage theft going on.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

15-19, yeah. I pegged it a little higher from what I was able to gather, around 23k. Some of that is just how the data is displayed though. Here at 5k it's entirely likely that you're seeing the federal minimum wage outweigh other factors, (7.25*2080=15,080). By fifths and quartiles it can come in a bit higher, but always below the median. And I don't think that gets nearly enough attention.

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

Thanks. That graph shows the Mode, which skews even lower.