134
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)
the_dunk_tank
15905 readers
580 users here now
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to !shitreactionariessay@lemmygrad.ml
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Democrats have been on board with bans on porn for the most part. Both parties are morality police under the guise of "protect the kids".
Love that PornHub just isn't able to load in several states without a VPN.
are they though? they haven't been very active about it but that's true of every red-state legislation they don't have large enough minorities to disrupt.
I haven't looked at this story for a while, and this is just the first link I saw, but California is (was?) looking at one of these age verification laws. Calmatters.org
wow, that's really surprising, California should be the stronghold of the porn lobby, somebody forgot to grease some palms damn
Based uniparty