549
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

They're usually shredded alive almost immediately because they're seen as "waste" since they don't lay eggs

For some more context:

Why the egg industry 'shreds' baby chicks alive (NSFL)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Num10ck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Roosters are very aggressive and territorial and wouldn't just chill with homies.

plus Cock Meat is an awkward marketing phrase for some.

My dad has had pet chickens for decades, and his roosters always chill. They're highly intelligent animals. If you give them lots of vegetation and space and provide for their basic needs and well-being, they don't really get too aggressive.

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 month ago

Yea see that's the problem right there. No of these companies provide any of that to their chickens.

It's not profitable to do so. Capitalism is relentless and soulless.

[-] WldFyre@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago

There's no way socialism would provide that either on the scale that the Western world consumes chickens. We should still go vegan in a socialist economy.

Oh I fully agree. Same in an anarchist community.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
549 points (99.8% liked)

196

16042 readers
2440 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS