549
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.ml to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

They're usually shredded alive almost immediately because they're seen as "waste" since they don't lay eggs

For some more context:

Why the egg industry 'shreds' baby chicks alive (NSFL)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

I presume, like everything else wrong with Capitalism, it comes down to cost. It's more cost efficient somehow. I don't understand the details, because I'm not a chicken farmer, but I have been in the capitalism machine for a long, long time, and I'd bet a shitton of tax payer money that it's purely down to cost.

If it saves $0.02 per chicken, they'll gladly poison the rivers, oceans, lakes, etc. with refuse and baby chick corpses.

[-] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 6 points 1 month ago

In this case it's because if you raised them no-one would want to buy them. The egg laying breeds are a lot tougher and have a lot less meet than the ones bred for meat. They also cost more per amount of meat in the end.

The simple fact is that people don't want to buy that, so it'd just be wasteful to grow them out.

[-] Tyfud@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago
[-] ephemeral_gibbon@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago

Not mostly, mostly consumer preferences. You wouldn't be able to sell them and it'd just be wasteful

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2024
549 points (99.8% liked)

196

16042 readers
2984 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS