217
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by Blaze@reddthat.com to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 1 month ago

As an Irish person, geographically, it does. Politically it does not. Given this is a geographical map, rather than political, it's appropriate.

I wouldn't want to see the typical map if great Britain and Northern Ireland with ROI missing. I zoomed in to see my town, which luckily is above water.

[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Geographically, it's latitude and longitude. Naming is political, not geography.

[-] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Geography also describes features, like islands. These islands are named the British isles.

Youre talking about coordinates for location, not geography.

Naming can be political, but is not inherently so.

[-] insaneinthemembrane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Naming is ownership, unless it is describing geography like islands.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago

It does, especially given the name predates the country by 2-3 thousand years; it's not exactly optimal but in reality "These Islands" is the only alternative and something is needed to refer to them from outside the islands.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

Except it was a politicised term used by an occupying force to strengthen their claim over our lands. Apologies if the suffering of our people, decimation of our language and culture and not to mention crippling genocide should be tolerated by use because "British and Irish and isles" is too wordy for you.

Ill take south eastern icelandic archipelago if you would prefer.

[-] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It wasn't, however the association with Great Britain is undeniable, especially when Lesser Britain doesn't even refer to Ireland any more (in Roman times it did), but Brittany, however "British Isles" was in use by the Greeks (at least Prettanic Isles) before even that - well before the union of England and Scotland, never mind Ireland's conquest.

Personally I'm happy with Atlantic Isles/Islands/Archipelago as I agree the term isn't great due to the implicit association, but it's not like it was something just made up by colonists.

[-] Squizzy@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

I didnt say it was created by colonists, it was however pushed as a term to be used to strengthen the view in eyebof the public, this was a specific policy noted by Churchill.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
217 points (98.7% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

3259 readers
53 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS