77
submitted 1 month ago by poVoq@slrpnk.net to c/energy@slrpnk.net
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I’d really be interested to see a comparison between the costs of electrifying the rail network vs using synthetic diesel for freight throughout the US.

Unlike cars or semi trucks, diesel-electric locomotives are extremely efficient. On the other hand, electrifying the many thousands of miles of track that run through large, unpopulated areas of the US seems like a monumental challenge that would yield far fewer benefits over electrifying cars.

[-] user134450@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago

trains are actually one of the examples where you can get away with lower energy dense fuels, like methanol, ammonia or even compressed hydrogen. sure the range will go down, but for many connections this will not matter that much because it will still be possible to go 1000km with one tank if needed.

[-] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

It worked on every other continent. Of course it would be harder to do in the US because they've neglected building out their railways for so long. But the Chinese built a high speed rail network in a few years. There's no practical reason why the US wouldn't be able to do it.

[-] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

The U.S. can’t build like China does. Too many stakeholders to satisfy. Labour too expensive. Too many regulations. The high-speed rail line from San Francisco to LA is going to cost more than all of China’s high-speed rail projects combined!

this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
77 points (98.7% liked)

Green Energy

2042 readers
129 users here now

everything about energy production

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS