739
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 month ago

Because it's easier to use the version that's in the distro, and why do I need an extra set of libraries filling up my disk.

I see flatpack as a last resort, where I trade disk space for convenience, because you end up with a whole OS worth of flatpack dependencies (10+ GB) on your disk after a few upgrade cycles.

[-] F04118F@feddit.nl 12 points 1 month ago

Is compiling it yourself with the time and effort that it costs worth more than a few GB of disk space?

Then your disk is very expensive and your labor very cheap.

[-] cley_faye@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

For a lot of project "compiling yourself", while obviously more involved than running some magic install command, is really not that tedious. Good projects have decent documentation in that regard and usually streamline everything down to a few things to configure and be done with it.

What's aggravating is projects that explicitly go out of their way to make building them difficult, removing existing documentation and helper tools and replacing them with "use whatever we decided to use". I hate these.

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

I should have noted that I'll compile myself when we are talking about something that should run as a service on a server.

[-] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago

99% of the time it's just "make && sudo make install" or something like that. Anything bigger or more complicated typically has a native package anyway.

[-] ReveredOxygen@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They didn't say anything about compiling it themselves, just that they prefer native packages to flatpak

edit: I can't read

[-] Batbro@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 month ago

2 comments up they said

If the choice then is flatpack vs compile your own, I think I'll generally compile it, but it depends on the circumstances.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I mean it's 2024. I regularly download archives that are several tens or even over 100 GB and then completely forget they're sitting on my drive, because I don't notice it when the drive is 4TB. Last time I cared about 10GB here and there was in the late-2000s.

[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Great that you have 4tb on your root partition then by all means use flatpack.

I have 256Gb on my laptop, as I recall I provisioned about 40-50gigs to root.

[-] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm sorry. I didn't realize people were still regularly using such constrained systems. Honest. I've homebuilt my PCs for the last 15 years.

[-] uranibaba@lemmy.world -5 points 1 month ago

Why not upgrade your hdd?

[-] Vilian@lemmy.ca 0 points 1 month ago
[-] BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Yep that's all well and good, but what flatpack doesn't do automatically is clean up unused libs/dependencies, over time you end up with several versions of the same libs. When the apps are upgraded they get the latest version of their dependency and leave the old behind.

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
739 points (93.8% liked)

linuxmemes

20351 readers
999 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS