132
submitted 1 month ago by Recant@beehaw.org to c/foss@beehaw.org
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

"Ethical" does not mean "good", "moral", or "right", it means something more like, "consistent with an explicit set of ethical axioms." It's meaningless to say something is unethical without stating or at least implying a specific ethical philosophy.

Carnism says that it is sometimes acceptable or even good to be cruel and violent to animals. Veganism says that it only is in cases of absolute necessity. A researcher or scientist for a cosmetics company might follow all the ethical requirements of their profession, and yet by any other standard, do unforgivable harm both to animals they experiment on and to the humans they mean to exploit with their research.

[-] Vodulas@beehaw.org 4 points 1 month ago

something is unethical without stating or at least implying a specific ethical philosophy.

Which is why I followed it up by saying the best we can do is harm reduction by choosing the less harmful paths when we find them. Nothing you are saying is different to what I said, just a different wording

this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
132 points (99.3% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17622 readers
695 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS