132
submitted 1 month ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/climate@slrpnk.net

Archived copy of the article: archive.today

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago

That’s the issue though, trees were thought to be carbon positive, A the tree species matters, and when the trees naturally die it comes back out. It’s only temporary storage.

Idk if I would call it a scam or if they just didn’t do enough prior research ahead of time.

[-] nightwatch_admin@feddit.nl 2 points 1 month ago

You’re being way too thoughtful and nice about it. Commendable, truly - but the people running this scam might just as well buy a box of matches and promise not to ignite them. It’s to evade regulation, not to actually make a change.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

In the context of the USA, yeah I guess that’s fair.

Other countries have better checks and balances, most of what I’ve seen on this has been non-USA research, so likely there’s a reason for that.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I don't think it all comes out though? Unless you just burn the wood or allow it to decay.

I reckon that a timber house is going to be carbon positive for quite a while. Unless it burns down or is neglected so bad that it decays. Same for high quality furniture.

[-] SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

You’re not wrong, but eventually it will decay and come out. 1000 years, or demolished for an expansion after 10 years.

Survivorship bias as well, not all timber houses will last the test of time, same with furniture. The point is, it all will eventually come back out, so it’s more of a, not my problem, it’s the futures problem. Or ship it to someone else. Either way, it’s neutral.

[-] boonhet@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago

In the span of 1000 years, is there anything we can do anyway?

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
132 points (99.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

4916 readers
656 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS