You think everyone is prejudiced like you are?
No, I KNOW most people are able to see it’s just facial hair and means nothing. There’s a small select bunch of people like you though.
But keep perpetuating that prejudice!
You think everyone is prejudiced like you are?
No, I KNOW most people are able to see it’s just facial hair and means nothing. There’s a small select bunch of people like you though.
But keep perpetuating that prejudice!
I was raised to be prejudiced so now I’m perpetuating it.
Keep it up buddy!
it’s about how the final product looks on their face.
… That’s even worse lol.
You don’t like that style on that particular face.
You’re just a terrible person apparently.
What’s a creeper mustache? Are people who are able to grow a full mustache somehow immediately a child predator? That makes no fucking sense,
Are we just being prejudiced now to facial hair?
They fucked up by responding to you.
Gotta suspend some reality though. I get walking simulators are a thing, but to do a quest you would need to travel a couple full days by horse? And filling in that content too, just doesn’t work in most games.
That’s… one designed around being able to travel in a car…
I read a lot of old scifi anthologies, a lot barely have a handful of reviews. Example, my last one. It’s edited by Asimov, and at the time he was one of the leading authors. So they’re popular, just old so not anymore?
I enjoy the pacing, I can usually end a story in my reading window as I would say on average they are around 40 pages. So a 30 minute commitment. But some do go up to over a hundred pages, some are even just a hundred words.
People want action, and there was enough politics too, adding in “plot armor” force transfer would be too much talking and not enough slicing.
I get why it’s not there, most of the information IS there, just not spelled out, it’s even scrambled if you would.
No, I’m reading the words that they said and parsed them, without any previous knowledge, why would the assumption be random? That’s adding details that aren’t even there lol.
You realize that resulting to insults you mind as well just wave a flag saying you’re wrong.
It’s okay to admit you were wrong.
You assumed wrong, when they provided all the information you needed.
It could be what you’re saying, but you would need to intentionally ignore the context of “which one”.
It’s funny you speak of bias, when you’re the one being biased and assuming based of everything being “randomly selected”. I read what the person said and parsed it, you didn’t.
It’s like having a police lineup where one person is a crook, it’s not some survey lmfao.
Breakers are just reusable fuses.