40
submitted 1 week ago by 0x815@feddit.org to c/europe@feddit.org

[...] For most of human history, height remained relatively stable. Until 1800, the average height in Europe hovered between 165 cm and 170 cm, but over the past 200 years something remarkable has happened: heights, globally but particularly in Europe, have increased dramatically. Many European countries saw increases in average heights of over 15 cm, and this has been especially evident in the Netherlands – the average Dutch man has grown from 166 cm in 1810 to 184 cm today, an increase of 18 cm in just two centuries. Dutch men are currently the tallest in the world.

[...] Recent research shows that long-lasting or recurring illnesses were associated with shorter adult heights in the Netherlands in the 19th century, while shorter, one-off periods of illness may have actually been helpful for growth. This is likely because less severe illnesses boosted immunity against future infections.

The deaths of parents, particularly of mothers, have also been shown to result in shorter heights. For very young children, this would have been because they depend on their mothers for nutrition, but it was also true for older children, indicating the profound stress of losing a primary caregiver.

Curiously, although losing a mother was linked to shorter children’s heights – in the Netherlands and elsewhere – losing a father was not, potentially due to the gendered nature of parental care in this period.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] anzo@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

"Regression to the mean", it was studied a century, or so, ago. It's not about stress directly but the average/ natural/ non-stressful height is the most probable outcome indeed.

[-] 0x815@feddit.org 2 points 1 week ago

This was Francis Galton, a British polymath of the 19th and early 20th century, who observed that certain characteristics of parents -such as height- are not passed on completely to their children. If parents' heights lie at the tails of the distribution in both directions, the heights of their children tend to lie closer to the mean of the distribution. Simply speaking, tall parents have kids shorter then they are, and short parents have kids taller than they are.

Galton invented what we today now as linear regression.

The article says that the Dutch children are now shorter than their parents. I was wondering whether this is simply a manifestation of the regression toward the mean, first discovered by Galton (and published in 1886)?

this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2024
40 points (95.5% liked)

Europe

717 readers
401 users here now

News, interesting stories, and beautiful pictures from Europe 🇪🇺

Spiritual successor to !europe@feddit.de.

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain)

Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures.

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other. (E.g., no direct insults against each other.)
  2. No bigotry, racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  3. No links to mis-information.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 2 weeks ago
MODERATORS