399
submitted 1 month ago by Beaver@lemmy.ca to c/politics@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 73 points 1 month ago

I don't know why people think RCV would be considered difficult, we love ranking shit.

[-] Stovetop@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

It's about preservation of power.

In any solid red or blue location, the party in control will promote any narrative to discredit RCV because it could only weaken their influence in the area.

For example, most people who are progressives vote blue only because the alternative is far worse. But if a heavily blue state were to pass RCV, it might mean gasp that Democrats lose seats to a more progressive party.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

WORST nightmare of liberal fortresses with a significant percentage of alienated progressives such as Detroit, Portland, Austin and all of California!

[-] MindTraveller@lemmy.ca 26 points 1 month ago

We should explain it to voters as "create a buzzfeed listicle of your favourite politicians"

[-] Meron35@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

RCV: where you create a tier list of all available candidates

[-] simplejack@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Ballot design.

Some RCV ballot designs are better than others. For example:

Also, as an experience designer who has had the pleasure of sitting in many many user tests, never under estimate how dumb people are. Some people are going to be confused by the new thing because it’s new. Good news is that this goes away after an election or two and most of the public gets used to it.

[-] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Great example names BTW! GoGo/Sauce 2028!

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah that's an incredibly good point.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

How dare you rack Dr Cherry Blossom so low. SHE STRIPPED HER WAY THROUGH MED SCHOOL

[-] Beaver@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 month ago

Yup, just gotta build up the movement and educate people so they can pressure the politicians.

[-] Wogi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Tier zoo has entered the chat

[-] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I just watched the Turtle list the other day haha

[-] gibmiser@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Fuck you Betty, Sue is my #1 MySpace friend!

[-] mjhelto@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

And we have fucking computers to do most of the heavy lifting!

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
399 points (97.2% liked)

politics

18601 readers
3675 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS