1004

Hunter Biden’s lawyer filed an ethics complaint in the House of Representatives on Friday against Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene for reaching a “new level of abhorrent behavior” after she displayed sexually explicit pictures of him during a hearing Wednesday.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] bemenaker@lemmy.world 309 points 1 year ago

Now file charges under DC revenge porn law

[-] Hnazant@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

Then emailed it to non age verified people.

[-] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 22 points 1 year ago

So, she should be on the sexual offenders list?

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 57 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately she's protected by congressional immunity. If only people in power didn't create special rules for themselves.

[-] DoctorTYVM@lemmy.world 98 points 1 year ago

Only when she says it on the floor as a congresswoman. She doesn't have carte blanche to say whatever she wants anywhere else.

And since she sent out his nudes in a mailer, he can sue

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

I’m not sure she had immunity here. Did she have a lawful right to obtain those pictures or to release them in a public hearing? Probably not.

Further, I’m pretty certain this didn’t fall under legitimate legislative purposes.

She may be personally interest in hunter’s giant cock, but it’s difficult to imagine a legitimate governmental interest- especially since he’s a private citizen not employed by the government. Him doing a porn shoot or having a dick are irrelevant to an irs investigation.

[-] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Can the American people sue the dumb bitch?

[-] Madison420@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Yes, it's called impeachment.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Yeah. Probably. I mean, maybe not for this. but generally you can try and sue people for anything. You do have to demonstrate harm- and that's a very specific legal context. if you can find a lawyer willing to sue for it, it's fair game. that said, it would be extremely difficult for the average american to show she harmed them sufficiently to justify a civil lawsuit.

in other words, you'd probably loose.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.one 27 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately, she does have carte blanche, implicitly, when nobody has the guts to stand up for justice and charge her for the crime.

[-] Skates@feddit.nl 12 points 1 year ago

What does congressional immunity specify about guillotines?

[-] peto@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

They are discouraged. Rather too humane.

[-] RagingRobot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

How else would we see the presidents sons penis? This is America! It used to be tradition to show your tax return. Now they will just show their sons penises.

[-] TheHighRoad@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

I've been thinking this is exactly the way to go.

this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
1004 points (98.0% liked)

politics

18608 readers
3423 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS