60
submitted 1 month ago by RandAlThor@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Why would the US not be happy about this? It takes us closer to our 2%, and guarding the Arctic is easily the most natural role for Canada to fill.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 month ago

Could be argued that the US administration is more interested in making military equipment sales than bolstering NATO.

I figure you're right though. All our allies should be happy when Canada pulls it's own weight.

[-] cygnus@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

I'm not aware of the US selling their subs to anyone. They had a partial tech-sharing program with the UK a while back.

[-] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

And they are helping the Aussies develop nuclear-powered subs, notably with UK reactors, though.

[-] Grimpen@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Although the US/Aus deal scuppered a Aus/France deal for subs IIRC.

[-] Jumpingspiderman@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

The Chinese would have landed in Sydney by the time the French laid the keels for the subs in the deal they struck with Australia.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

US military sales are not limited to subs. Doubtless they want to sell more planes and everything else. You can look up graphs of US arms exports, it's a lot.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
60 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

7067 readers
292 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


๐Ÿ Meta


๐Ÿ—บ๏ธ Provinces / Territories


๐Ÿ™๏ธ Cities / Regions


๐Ÿ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


๐Ÿ’ป Universities


๐Ÿ’ต Finance / Shopping


๐Ÿ—ฃ๏ธ Politics


๐Ÿ Social & Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS