18
submitted 3 weeks ago by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
5
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/alberta@lemmy.ca

That is all.

10
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/hockey@lemmy.ca
35
submitted 1 month ago by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/tenforward@lemmy.world
84
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/tenforward@lemmy.world

We saw his father, his mother, his grandfather, his brother, his other brother, and his daughter. Not too shabby for an Android.

75
58
6
submitted 1 month ago by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca

I found this fascinating, and interesting history.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 196 points 1 month ago

Don't blame her one bit.

21
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Or to load a whole bunch at once so you can Ctrl+F? I used to use RES on the other site to do that.

10

I use an old mixed nuts container.

140
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/til@lemmy.world

Maximum, that is.

1 child policy from 1979 to 2015.

2 child policy from 2015 to 2021.

3 child policy since 2021.

The announcement came after the release of the results of the Seventh National Population Census, which showed that the number of births in mainland China in 2020 was only 12 million, the lowest number of births since 1960, and the further aging of the population, against which the policy was born.[5] This was the slowest population growth rate China experienced.[6]

Although the CCP government had high expectations for the new policy,[16] in a 2021 online poll conducted by the state media Xinhua on its Weibo account, using the hashtag #AreYouReady for the new three-child policy, about 29,000 out of 31,000 respondents stated they would "never consider it."[15]

12
submitted 1 month ago by someguy3@lemmy.ca to c/askeurope@lemmy.world
[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 139 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

What, wait they were doing a mock trial? Holy fucking shit.

They can't do it for real, so they just make it up entirely! Holy. Fucking. Shit.

The depths of them making shit up is just unbelievable.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 163 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

the government has given the go-ahead for the first step towards complete digital sovereignty in the state, with further steps to follow.

The term digital sovereignty is very important here. If a public administration uses proprietary, closed software that can’t be studied or modified, it is very difficult to know what happens to users’ data:

We have no influence on the operating processes of such [proprietary] solutions and the handling of data, including a possible outflow of data to third countries. As a state, we have a great responsibility towards our citizens and companies to ensure that their data is kept safe with us and we must ensure that we are always in control of the IT solutions we use and that we can act independently as a state.

Digital sovereignty seems to be the primary impetus, so this might go far. Saving money is secondary.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 214 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Many of the people that think being gay is a choice are in fact bisexual. So for them it's a choice on whether or not to act on it. They assume everyone else works the same way.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 185 points 8 months ago

Men of quality do not fear equality.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 125 points 9 months ago

I can't believe the Republicans are appeasers. They beat the drum for decades how Democrats couldn't stand up to tyrants, and now Republicans are literally appeasers. It's 1984 levels of turnaround.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 215 points 10 months ago

Actually a legit question.

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 220 points 11 months ago

Ok a 50 page memo? That's pretty friggin long. Depends how many of those you get a day.

But:

I summed up this highly classified memo into Trump's sort of bombastic language because it was the only way he was gonna understand," Taylor added. "I mean, I literally said in there, 'You know, if we leave Afghanistan too fast, the terrorists will call us losers. But if we wanna be seen as winners, we need to make sure the Afghan forces have the strength to push back against these criminals.' I mean, it was that dumb and that's how you had to talk to him."

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 153 points 11 months ago

I think these long explainations of instances and federation are really not necessary. It should just say "pick a server and start browsing. You'll be able to see everything*."

"*If you really want to get into the weeds, blah blah blah."

[-] someguy3@lemmy.ca 189 points 11 months ago

They won't be happy until we are all gay.

Christians want everyone to be Christian, they want Christian schools, they want a Christian nation, so they project that gay people want all the same things. That gay people want everyone to be gay, have gay schools, a gay country, etc. It's all projection.

view more: next ›

someguy3

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF