1203
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by rxxrc@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.world

All our servers and company laptops went down at pretty much the same time. Laptops have been bootlooping to blue screen of death. It's all very exciting, personally, as someone not responsible for fixing it.

Apparently caused by a bad CrowdStrike update.

Edit: now being told we (who almost all generally work from home) need to come into the office Monday as they can only apply the fix in-person. We'll see if that changes over the weekend...

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Monument 46 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Honestly kind of excited for the company blogs to start spitting out their ~~disaster recovery~~ crisis management stories.

I mean - this is just a giant test of ~~disaster recovery~~ crisis management plans. And while there are absolutely real-world consequences to this, the fix almost seems scriptable.

If a company uses IPMI (~~Called~~ Branded AMT and sometimes vPro by Intel), and their network is intact/the devices are on their network, they ought to be able to remotely address this.
But that’s obviously predicated on them having already deployed/configured the tools.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 11 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I mean - this is just a giant test of disaster recovery plans.

Anyone who starts DR operations due to this did 0 research into the issue. For those running into the news here...

CrowdStrike Blue Screen solution

CrowdStrike blue screen of death error occurred after an update. The CrowdStrike team recommends that you follow these methods to fix the error and restore your Windows computer to normal usage.

Rename the CrowdStrike folder
Delete the “C-00000291*.sys” file in the CrowdStrike directory
Disable CSAgent service using the Registry Editor

No need to roll full backups... As they'll likely try to update again anyway and bsod again. Caching servers are a bitch...

[-] Monument 13 points 4 months ago

I think we’re defining disaster differently. This is a disaster. It’s just not one that necessitates restoring from backup.

Disaster recovery is about the plan(s), not necessarily specific actions. I would hope that companies recognize rerolling the server from backup isn’t the only option for every possible problem.
I imagine CrowdStrike pulled the update, but that would be a nightmare of epic dumbness if organizations got trapped in a loop.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 8 points 4 months ago

I think we’re defining disaster differently. This is a disaster.

I've not read a single DR document that says "research potential options". DR stuff tends to go into play AFTER you've done the research that states the system is unrecoverable. You shouldn't be rolling DR plans here in this case at all as it's recoverable.

I imagine CrowdStrike pulled the update

I also would imagine that they'd test updates before rolling them out. But we're here... I honestly don't know though. None of the systems under my control use it.

[-] Skimflux@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Right, "research potential options" is usually part of Crysis Management, which should precede any application of the DR procedures.

But there's a wide range for the scope of those procedures, they might go from switching to secondary servers to a full rebuild from data backups on tape. In some cases they might be the best option even if the system is easily recoverable (eg: if the DR procedure is faster than the recovery options).

Just the 'figuring out what the hell is going on' phase can take several hours, if you can get the DR system up in less than that it's certainly a good idea to roll it out. And if it turns out that you can fix the main system with a couple of lines of code that's great, but noone should be getting chastised for switching the DR system on to keep the business going while the main machines are borked.

[-] Monument 2 points 4 months ago

That’s a really astute observation - I threw out disaster recovery when I probably ought to have used crisis management instead. Imprecise on my part.

[-] Monument 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

The other commenter on this pointed out that I should have said crisis management rather than disaster recovery, and they’re right - and so were you, but I wasn’t thinking about that this morning.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 3 points 4 months ago

Nah, it's fair enough. I'm not trying to start an argument about any of this. But ya gotta talk in terms that the insurance people talk in (because that's what your c-suite understand it in). If you say DR... and didn't actually DR... That can cause some auditing problems later. I unfortunately (or fortunately... I dunno) hold the C-suite position in a few companies. DR is a nasty word. Just like "security incident" is a VERY nasty phrase.

[-] jj4211@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Note this is easy enough to do if systems are booting or you dealing with a handful, but if you have hundreds of poorly managed systems, discard and do again.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah I can only imagine trying to walk someone through an offsite system that got bitlocked because you need to get into safe-mode. reimage from scratch might just be a faster process. Assuming that your infrastructure is setup to do it automatically through network.

[-] StaySquared@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Nah... just boot into safemode > cmd prompt: CD C:\Windows\System32\drivers\CrowdStrike

Then: del C-00000291*.sys

Exit/reboot.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 1 points 4 months ago

The stuff I copied into the end of my comment is direct from CrowdStrike,.

[-] StaySquared@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

Hm.. yeah what I provided worked for us.

[-] CanadaPlus 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I'm here right now just to watch it unfold in real time. Unfortunately Reddit is looking juicer on that front.

https://libreddit.northboot.xyz

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago

IPMI (Called AMT and sometimes vPro by Intel),

IPMI is not AMT. AMT/vPro is closed protocol, right? Also people are disabling AMT, because of listed risks, which is too bad; but it's easier than properly firewalling it.

Better to just say "it lets you bring up the console remotely without windows running, so machines can be fixed by people who don't have to come into the office".

[-] Monument 1 points 4 months ago

Ah, you’re right. A poor turn of phrase.

I meant to say that intel brands their IPMI tools as AMT or vPro. (And completely sidestepped mentioning the numerous issues with AMT, because, well, that’s probably a novel at this point.)

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago

On desktops, nobody does. Servers, yes, all the time.

[-] ninekeysdown@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Depends on your management solutions. Intel vPro can allow remote access like that on desktops & laptops even if they’re on WiFi and in some cases cellular. It’s gotta be provisioned first though.

[-] catloaf@lemm.ee 2 points 4 months ago

Yeah, and no company in my experience bothers provisioning it. The cost of configuring and maintaining it exceeds the cost of handling failure events, even on large scales like this.

[-] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

VPro is massively a desktop feature. Servers have proper IPMI/iDrac with more features, and VPro fills (part of) that management gap for desktops. It's pretty cool it's not spoiled or disabled. Time to reburn all the desktops in east-07? VPro will be the way.

this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2024
1203 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

59710 readers
1827 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS