755
submitted 4 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The woman accused of being first to spread the fake rumours about the Southport killer which sparked nationwide riots has been arrested.

Racist riots spread across the country after misinformation spread on social media claiming the fatal stabbing was carried out by Ali Al-Shakati, believed to be a fictitious name, a Muslim aslyum seeker who was on an MI6 watchlist.

A 55-year-old woman from Chester has now been arrested on suspicion of publishing written material to stir up racial hatred, and false communication. She remains in police custody.

While she has not been named in the police statement about the arrest, it is believed to be Bonnie Spofforth, a mother-of-three and the managing director of a clothing company.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mechanize@feddit.it 195 points 4 months ago

While she has not been named in the police statement about the arrest, it is believed to be Bonnie Spofforth

This, I don't like. If you - the newspaper, the means of information - are not sure about a name you should really refrain from using it.

It would be not the first time people get their lives ruined by some careless journalist because of a namesake or just an error.

It's not that different from "spreading rumors".

That aside, in this case, it is probably a rumor from an inside source. Still. Not a fan.

[-] fox2263@lemmy.world 18 points 4 months ago

Ironically, the reason for all this in the first place.

[-] Wimopy@feddit.uk 17 points 4 months ago

I've also said this before and I'll say it again: names of suspects and even convicted criminals should not be shared unless necessary*. That just makes no sense for rehabilitation as it opens people up for judgement in a court of opinion. Justice is the job of the justice systems and should not generally involve the wider public.

Could there be issues with the judgement or other events where the only way to achieve justice is via the press? Sure, probably, but I don't think the default should be that if I google the name of someone I can find if they or someone with a similar name (and god forbid, appearance) were involved in a crime.

*: unless necessary here can cover cases like trying to find an individual on the run, or when their previous crime is meant to exclude them from specific lines of work, although even that should be on a need-to-know basis imo, not public info.

[-] AreaSIX@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago

Meanwhile here in Sweden, everyone's criminal record is public, and even available to search online. Unless the crime is something minor punished with a fine. It's really ridiculous, everything is publicly available online, like addresses, phone numbers, the cars or pets people own. Unless you have a protected identity, it's all available to everyone online. I tried to apply for a protected identity on account of being a public servant that is involved in making decisions many people very much dislike. But I couldn't provide a concrete threat so it was denied. It's like the system is still geared towards pre-internet times. The system itself in fact doxxes every resident in the country.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago

You're right but otherwise there are cases like child rapists that get a slap on the wrist and then go to represent a country at the Olympics

[-] viking@infosec.pub 7 points 4 months ago

Yep. In Germany for example we don't name perpetrators at all, neither alleged nor convicted. Newspapers are not allowed to refer to them with anything but the first name plus first letter of the last name, or initials. The only exception is when someone dangerous is on the run and they need help from the public to ID him, in that case the name is released after an ethical review board from the police force decides so (it's mostly done on the spot without delay, but there is a procedure at the very least).

A general exception is made for persons of interest, be it celebrities, politicians or something. For general members of the public, nothing truly identifiable is released. Minors (generally below the age of 18, or people tried as minors, i.e. committed a crime while below 18 but only tried later) will not be named whatsoever; only their age and gender are released.

Race is never mentioned, unless it is a race-related hate crime.

[-] Wispy2891@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Race is never mentioned, unless it is a race-related hate crime.

We need something like this in my country. There's a newspaper here (il giornale) that always has headlines like

  • African robs store
  • African rapes girl
  • Illegal alien shoplifts
  • Mad African shouts in a mall
  • Foreigner madness: demands food then gets mad when denied

And so on. The last (foreigner madness) is almost a catchphrase for them, if you search for "la follia dello straniero" it comes out only results from that outlet

A crime is a crime and the criminal nationality is irrelevant, unless you need to push some agenda

[-] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Social media has been weaponized and will only get worse as media conglomerates congregate further.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 months ago

They literally did the same thing she got arrested for.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 45 points 4 months ago

They know it's her, they're just shielding themselves from libel claims. The same way they'll say "allegedly" until a conviction.

[-] zaph@sh.itjust.works -1 points 4 months ago

If they were trying to shield themselves they could have not dropped a name. This is different than saying allegedly about someone who was arrested and the name released.

[-] Glytch@lemmy.world 25 points 4 months ago

True, but she also posted her lies publicly using her real name, so it isn't as though her name isn't already out there.

[-] gmtom@lemmy.world 32 points 4 months ago

That's not true at all.

She literally made shit up out of nowhere with no evidence.

The website is posting actual credible information based on available evidence I.e. journalism.

[-] suction@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

Wrrrooonnngggg

this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2024
755 points (97.7% liked)

World News

39378 readers
2038 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS