this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)
Ask Lemmygrad
947 readers
20 users here now
A place to ask questions of Lemmygrad's best and brightest
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Liberal "democracy" is not the solution, it just pretends to provide the illusion of choice when in reality you will always be voting for the bourgeoisie. The Marxist solution to electoralism is democratic centralism, where one party (the proletariat embodied as a party) controls the power and voting happens in different levels (municipal, provincial, national) and people vote for the people who are in charge, rather than for a party. The purpose of the party must be to serve the people, not some branding or political façade or being a place to allow the bourgeois/fascists to grow larger.
It's a pretty good con they pulled too. I'm certainly not advocating in favor of the US system.
Out of curiosity, is there any Marxist writing on democratic centralism?
I know I keep going on an on about it. But it's just that good. Roland Boer's Socialism with Chinese Characteristics: A Guide for Foreigners goes into Deng's critique of the earlier approach to democratic centralism in China. It's chapter 2, iirc. He discusses the contradictions between democracy and centralism and possible solutions to getting the right balance.
Linkery.