387

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

You're right, the Soviet Union joined the allies against the Nazis because they were explicitly not revolutionary defeatists, which cannot be said of a large number of modern day tankies.

[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 weeks ago

"Tankie" functions for libs the same way, as "woke" does for chuds. It's a meaningless term

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 weeks ago

And libs often seems to function for tankies in exactly the same way. I'm an anarchist but when I argue with tankies I get called a lib even as I call for the overthrow of capitalism. Funny how that works, almost as if the problem is dogmatism.

[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

Unlike "Tankie" and "woke", "lib" does in deed have a definition.

[-] Schmoo@slrpnk.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

So does "tankie" and "woke." I used mine correctly, you are indeed a tankie. When a chud calls a left-wing political activist woke, at least they're using it correctly, even if they don't necessarily know that they are.

You called me a liberal for - let me check - opposing imperialism regardless of who's doing it. Interesting, do you think that fits the definition?

[-] carl_marks_1312@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 weeks ago

So does “tankie” and “woke.”

Could you kindly defone that for me?

You called me a liberal

Where? Lol funny how you get that feeling I talked about you

this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
387 points (91.4% liked)

Memes

45129 readers
1800 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS