this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
37 points (97.4% liked)

Formula 1

11057 readers
56 users here now

Welcome to Formula1 @ lemmy.world Lemmy's largest community for Formula 1 and related racing series


๐Ÿ“† F1 Calendar
๐Ÿ FIA Documents
๐Ÿ“Š F1 Pace


2026 Calendar

Location Date
๐Ÿ‡ฏ๐Ÿ‡ต Japan 27-29 Mar
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ญ ~~Bahrain~~ ~~10-12 Apr~~
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฆ ~~Saudi Arabia~~ ~~17-19 Apr~~
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Miami) 01-03 May
๐Ÿ‡จ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Canada 22-24 May
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡จ Monaco 05-07 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Spain 12-14 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡น Austria 26-28 Jun
๐Ÿ‡ฌ๐Ÿ‡ง Great Britain 03-05 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ช Belgium 17-19 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡บ Hungary 24-26 Jul
๐Ÿ‡ณ๐Ÿ‡ฑ Netherlands 21-23 Aug
๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡น Italy (Monza) 04-06 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡ธ Barcelona-Catalunya 11-13 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ฟ Azerbaijan 24-26 Sep
๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿ‡ฌ Singapore 09-11 Oct
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Austin) 23-25 Oct
๐Ÿ‡ฒ๐Ÿ‡ฝ Mexico 30 Oct-01 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ง๐Ÿ‡ท Brazil 06-08 Nov
๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ USA (Las Vegas) 19-21 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ถ๐Ÿ‡ฆ Qatar 27-29 Nov
๐Ÿ‡ฆ๐Ÿ‡ช Abu Dhabi 04-06 Dec

Rules

1. Be respectful.
Treat drivers, teams, and fellow Lemmings with respect. Healthy debate is encouraged, but keep it civil and constructive.

2. No duplicate news.
Please check the feed before posting. Multiple posts from different news companies reporting the exact same thing will be removed to keep the feed clean.

3. Spoilers.
This is a live sports community. We discuss sessions in real-time, so browse at your own risk during race weekends!

4. Make content accessible.
โ€ข Non-English articles: Include a translated summary (e.g., DeepL).
โ€ข Paywalled articles: Provide a brief summary in the comments.

5. Social media.
Post social media updates as screenshots so everyone can view them without needing an account. Always include the original source link.

6. Zero tolerance for spam. Strictly no gambling, crypto, or NFT-related content.


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 13 points 2 years ago (5 children)

I'm so confused, I always assume Horner is double speaking and shit talking but I can't quite figure out the angle here. Is it: "Go ahead and equalise the engines and fight amongst yourselves we have aero advantage anyway"?

[โ€“] Photographer@lemmy.world 12 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Engine equalisation would cut development costs massively, figuratively speaking in any technology 95% of the performance is achieved with 50% of the budget, so the big spends are always on the tiny things that keep you ahead of the competition, if everyone is equalised then there is no reason to waste money on developments that get the extra 2 or 3 HP from the system.

[โ€“] SatouKazuma@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Pareto efficiency for the win?

[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This sounds so sensible that I am still shocked that Christian "It wasn't me" Horner has said it ๐Ÿ˜ƒ.

[โ€“] Archive@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I think Horner is for it because he knows it will harm the competitors more than Red Bull.

[โ€“] bazpoint@kbin.social 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)

The other angle I haven't seen suggested here is that this is a forward-looking insurance play from Horner. At the moment RBPT are winning off the back of development work done by Honda in previous years. Nonetheless, they are new to the engine game and there is likely some substantial concern that when the next engine regs come they will be left floundering.

By backing the equalisation they give themselves precedent to demand the same again a few years down the line if RB engines fall behind the pack. They are likely very confident in the rest of their current package, to the point that they can risk making the current situation more competitive in order to guard against future disaster.

I don't especially like Horner, but I think it's hard to argue that he's anything but an excellent team principle, possibly the best on the grid. If he's doing this there is zero chance it's for altruistic reasons - there is a play for RB here somewhere, it's just a case of figuring out what it is.

[โ€“] mannycalavera@feddit.uk 1 points 2 years ago

This makes the most sense to me. Never trust Horner.

[โ€“] klz@kbin.social 7 points 2 years ago

I can see a few reasons why I think red bull won't be against this.

  1. They believe they have the best drive on the grid. Put everyone in identical cars and Max still probably wins everything
  2. They believe their aero package is better than anyone else
  3. They were helped by a similar thing a few years ago when Honda was dropping engine manufacturing. Paying back the karma
  4. Helps keep costs down. Making an engine be as good as everyone else is significantly easier than making an engine better than everyone else. There becomes a point when it is exponentially harder to increase performance
[โ€“] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

because they don't really want to make engines and don't want a repeat of 2014 with the next engine regulation change.

[โ€“] danielfgom@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If I'm not mistaken Red Bull will be making their own engines from either 2024 or 2026? I'm sure I read they they are building that facility now.

Maybe he's concerned that their first engine will be down on power compared to the rest, in which case equalising would benefit him.

[โ€“] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

yeah they are because they have to. I'm sure they would prefer not to.

[โ€“] lackthought 1 points 2 years ago

equalise the engines and fight amongst yourselves we have aero advantage anyway

this is what it sounds like, Red Bull has Adrian Newey so might as well neutralize the engine advantage that Ferrari or Merc could possibly have