this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
316 points (95.1% liked)

A Comm for Historymemes

2404 readers
1140 users here now

A place to share history memes!

Rules:

  1. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia, assorted bigotry, etc.

  2. No fascism, atrocity denial, etc.

  3. Tag NSFW pics as NSFW.

  4. Follow all Lemmy.world rules.

Banner courtesy of @setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
PugJesus@lemmy.world
PugJesus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
316
Take that, Sir Isaac Nerdton (lemmy.world)
submitted 6 months ago by PugJesus@lemmy.world to c/historymemes@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I don't think incels were possible back then

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

... you... don't think there were people too poor, or ugly, or unhygenic, or rude, or abrasive, or poor of health, ... to have ever had a sexual encounter, to ever be married ... and to become misogynistic as a result?

[–] PugJesus@lemmy.world 10 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Considering that marriage was not optional for the vast majority of people and the extremely low standards for the treatment of women, incels would have been vanishingly rare. Maybe a few literal lepers.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

I feel we are both technically correct here.

Were incels common? Almost certainly not.

Were incels impossible? No. Rare, but not impossible.